Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:58:14 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        rkrcmar@redhat.com, alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com,
        x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] kvm: Add guest side support for free memory hints
Message-ID: <20190211124925-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20190204181118.12095.38300.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
 <20190204181552.12095.46287.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
 <20190209194437-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <0d12ccec-d05f-80b8-9498-710d521c81d2@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0d12ccec-d05f-80b8-9498-710d521c81d2@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:48:11AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/9/19 4:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:15:52AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Add guest support for providing free memory hints to the KVM hypervisor for
> >> freed pages huge TLB size or larger. I am restricting the size to
> >> huge TLB order and larger because the hypercalls are too expensive to be
> >> performing one per 4K page.
> > Even 2M pages start to get expensive with a TB guest.
> 
> Yeah, but we don't allocate and free TB's of memory at a high frequency.
> 
> > Really it seems we want a virtio ring so we can pass a batch of these.
> > E.g. 256 entries, 2M each - that's more like it.
> 
> That only makes sense for a system that's doing high-frequency,
> discontiguous frees of 2M pages.  Right now, a 2M free/realloc cycle
> (THP or hugetlb) is *not* super-high frequency just because of the
> latency for zeroing the page.

Heh but with a ton of free memory, and a thread zeroing some of
it out in the background, will this still be the case?
It could be that we'll be able to find clean pages
at all times.


> A virtio ring seems like an overblown solution to a non-existent problem.

It would be nice to see some traces to help us decide one way or the other.

-- 
MST