Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp3032619imj; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:38:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZ9+o+5UZSK4XHnPdBDzjPyDtlW89NowNOz/+Hr4utvBmqUlrJh2wVWFloOs11tiHtFsOYL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b681:: with SMTP id c1mr89735pls.103.1549917508679; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:38:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549917508; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j8BN4MgIhH3yt6vOHNeueB6htx5QoZefPbneX5dWKP2EdAdl6O9pZ0Wli4D9hjsheC MQlMO8/nJgzIIY/ncu9yZ8SZ+GZLN096+M0QOFFYs8aJT6kk/+0XkavzR5+T+XG3lLfu r+Wl1dqF7KyiEPlUs/aRc6J/+KxQ8kjAUrfBU3BglnIuVuy2IdFhlhCIOdPgeE1g5aKR 7GiykeJrDJlu7UAooIg4BXe9zICphNjcttGSLEe1dCDEGGJtjZTeKV9mZvmeQnMmBQhA UMnb3ZGmlp/bg5x3SgmOOUjjXRgZ+yetJD4GMf105+81+agf1pAGFs7iG0pfFC3/rPGN dC1Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=E5xjyu8BOALU6iMGO9mjguxWKHCY2sMIPb6ewdju9BI=; b=DWBSP957VohOZdQEtASkrbmRZCaIhQbASTzTdPvw4pSfRTFs4+c7ZnX/CxvC9+Fv/0 s+1mdanwXn6EYYWuV+iRMFwV2WlYZ+1w2UqGuPLohJqjJ17+86gm+wkZ27rxCLiAJ7Lh IOJoKrdEA8aU6dYLfqsqAnTd5Nlf/oSPa1HyC2SaTJuP3PvTL+YbI8Y7lmQVB6V+qaFn p1Spuh+Mea8ZlkQwU/ZU3zWOMCZuZby4XyGtX7+C7ff6Xboibi/sBkOwJsFxW2Z1TUDI MZzL9fcnZAweNawAUwD6pKMjATuxea8O5mhNURV0o2rjChn14DDuvtJw/SWgiVTkkkGK oV1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t9si11471746pfk.35.2019.02.11.12.38.13; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729891AbfBKSZV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:25:21 -0500 Received: from asavdk3.altibox.net ([109.247.116.14]:44962 "EHLO asavdk3.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727141AbfBKSZV (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:25:21 -0500 Received: from ravnborg.org (unknown [158.248.194.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asavdk3.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DAC6200F9; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:25:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:25:12 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Greg KH , Takashi Iwai , Jani Nikula , Arnd Bergmann , Maarten Lankhorst , Sean Paul , Maxime Ripard , Rodrigo Vivi , Joonas Lahtinen , "DRM maintainer tools announcements, discussion, and development" , intel-gfx , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel Subject: Re: [PULL] topic/component-typed Message-ID: <20190211182512.GA28363@ravnborg.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=dqr19Wo4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UWs3HLbX/2nnQ3s7vZ42gw==:117 a=UWs3HLbX/2nnQ3s7vZ42gw==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=CYLJJw9b-V7gLK0kE2YA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel. On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's the typed component topic branch. > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from Ram. > > drm-misc maintainers: Please pull, there's a drm doc patch follow-up > that I want to stuff into drm-misc-next. > > Greg: The drm side missed our feature cutoff, so will only land in 5.2. With all the dependencies why not bend the rule a little and get this in now? It is not like this is a huge patchset. Sam