Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:18:45 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <guroan@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@fb.com, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] vmalloc enhancements
Message-Id: <20190211111845.fcc4210d35020a721149da74@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190211190822.GA14443@cmpxchg.org>
References: <20181219173751.28056-1-guro@fb.com>
        <20190211190822.GA14443@cmpxchg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:08:22 -0500 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:37:48AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > The patchset contains few changes to the vmalloc code, which are
> > leading to some performance gains and code simplification.
> > 
> > Also, it exports a number of pages, used by vmalloc(),
> > in /proc/meminfo.
>
> These slipped through the cracks. +CC Andrew directly.
> Andrew, if it's not too late yet, could you consider them for 5.1?
> 

There's been some activity in vmalloc.c lately and these have
bitrotted.  They'll need a redo, please.