Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190210041721.GA2805@localhost.localdomain> <154977271617.2362.11794417398216386913.pr-tracker-bot@kernel.org>
 <20190211031921.GA1799@localhost.localdomain> <CAHk-=wgz_WpD7jc084QROuM0zszEG0-WvQhQZPsCboMOWNRiWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190211184000.GA4907@chatter.qube.local>
In-Reply-To: <20190211184000.GA4907@chatter.qube.local>
From:   Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:05:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMwyc-QpYpwqFsGpKSZL1mHdggFYR-XeT9Nb0WgH5LNrgB1KMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Thermal-SoC management fixes for v5.0-rc6
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>, pr-tracker-bot@kernel.org,
        Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 13:40, Konstantin Ryabitsev
<konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 04:25:16AM +0000, pr-tracker-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> >> > The pull request you sent on Sat, 9 Feb 2019 20:17:23 -0800:
> >> >
> >> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal fixes
> >> >
> >> > has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
> >> > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/7ad915f5ebf5b9e7ca98a7048d8f84a631fe388b
> >>
> >> I think the bot is off here because the above commit is about a merge
> >> from the linux-omap tree from Tony.
> >
> >Indeed.
> >
> >.. and the pr-tracker-bot thing actually made me ignore the pull
> >request, thinking I had left it in my inbox despite having pulled it.
> >
> >So it would be really good to know why pr-tracker-bot ended up
> >replying to the wrong email, because it can cause real problems.
>
> Simply put, it's because "it's a pull request sent to Linus." We
> currently don't disambiguate between Linus showing up in "To" or in "Cc"
> -- is that an important differentiation that should be enforced?

Linus:

Sorry, I totally misunderstood what you were saying -- I blame the jet
lag. I'll check out what's going on.

-K