Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261460AbUCKFKB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:10:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262637AbUCKFKB (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:10:01 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:41123 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261460AbUCKFJ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:09:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:05:10 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: "Amit S. Kale" Cc: trini@kernel.crashing.org, ak@muc.de, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, george@mvista.com, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: kgdb for mainline kernel: core-lite [patch 1/3] Message-Id: <20040310210510.34b50793.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200403111027.52534.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> References: <1xpyM-2Op-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <20040310123605.GA62228@colin2.muc.de> <20040310152750.GE5169@smtp.west.cox.net> <200403111027.52534.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1491 Lines: 32 On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:27:51 +0530 "Amit S. Kale" wrote: | On Wednesday 10 Mar 2004 8:57 pm, Tom Rini wrote: | > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 01:36:05PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: | > > > Yes. But as things stand, gdb 6.0 doesn't show stack traces correctly | > > > with esp and eip got from switch_to and gas 2.14 can't handle i386 | > > > dwarf2 CFI. Do we want to enforce getting a CVS version of gdb _and_ | > > > gas to build kgdb? Certainly not. | > > | > > binutils 2.15 should be released soon anyways AFAIK. And for x86-64 this | > > all works just fine (as demonstrated by Jim's/George's stub), so please | > > get rid of it at least for x86-64. I really don't want user_schedule | > > there, because it's completely unnecessary. | > | > I think more importantly, it's probably going to be one of those ugly | > things that will make it so much harder to get it into Linus' tree. So | > lets just say it'll require gdb 6.1 / binutils 2.15 for KGDB to work | > best. | | If we are enforcing this we need to do it correctly: is there any way to check | from source code whether binutils version is correct (even a gas check will | suffice) Documentation/Changes says to use "ld -v" for binutils version. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/