Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 0/5] riscv: minor fixes and cleanups
In-Reply-To: <20190211093406.GW4686@localhost>
CC:     aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, schwab@suse.de, atish.patra@wdc.com,
        anup@brainfault.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johan@kernel.org
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To:     johan@kernel.org
Message-ID: <mhng-d0cd3a60-098d-40dd-912c-f0cb77d54ae7@palmer-si-x1c4>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 01:34:06 PST (-0800), johan@kernel.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:03:03PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> This series fix up some minor issues found through inspection.
>>
>> Note that the fourth patch changes which cpu (hart) devicetree nodes
>> are enabled by following the Linux convention of considering nodes
>> without a status property as enabled.
>>
>> These patches are against the riscv-next (and fixes) branch with Andreas
>> node-reference fix applied:
>>
>> 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/mvm8szwwo1o.fsf@suse.de/
>>
>> and have been tested using QEMU.
>
>> Johan Hovold (5):
>>   riscv: add missing newlines to printk messages
>>   riscv: use pr_info and friends
>>   riscv: fix riscv_of_processor_hartid() comment
>>   riscv: treat cpu devicetree nodes without status as enabled
>>   riscv: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator
>
> Are these still in your queue, Palmer?
>
> Note that the node-reference dependency mentioned above is now in
> Linus's tree.

They're still in my queue.  With any luck I'll have time tonight to go through 
by Linux patch review backlog.