Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262647AbUCKFf5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:35:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262658AbUCKFfx (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:35:53 -0500 Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]:13797 "EHLO palrel10.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262647AbUCKFfq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:35:46 -0500 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16463.64173.334000.250278@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:35:41 -0800 To: David Brownell Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, Grant Grundler , Greg KH , vojtech@suse.cz, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, pochini@shiny.it Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: serious 2.6 bug in USB subsystem? In-Reply-To: <404FD24D.1070200@pacbell.net> References: <20031028013013.GA3991@kroah.com> <200310280300.h9S30Hkw003073@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FA12A2E.4090308@pacbell.net> <16289.29015.81760.774530@napali.hpl.hp.com> <16289.55171.278494.17172@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3FA28C9A.5010608@pacbell.net> <16457.12968.365287.561596@napali.hpl.hp.com> <404959A5.6040809@pacbell.net> <16457.26208.980359.82768@napali.hpl.hp.com> <4049FE57.2060809@pacbell.net> <20040308061802.GA25960@cup.hp.com> <16460.49761.482020.911821@napali.hpl.hp.com> <404CEA36.2000903@pacbell.net> <16461.35657.188807.501072@napali.hpl.hp.com> <404E00B5.5060603@pacbell.net> <16462.1463.686711.622754@napali.hpl.hp.com> <404E2B98.6080901@pacbell.net> <16462.48341.393442.583311@napali.hpl.hp.com> <404F40C2.3080003@pacbell.net> <16463.22710.230252.777998@napali.hpl.hp.com> <404FD24D.1070200@pacbell.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.3.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1165 Lines: 35 >>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:43:25 -0800, David Brownell said: David.B> David Mosberger wrote: >> The current OHCI relies on the internals of the dma_pool() >> implementation. ... David.B> It'd be good if you said _how_ you think it relies on such David.B> internals. >> I thought I did. Suppose somebody changed the dma_pool code >> such that it would overwrite freed memory with an >> 0xf00000000000000 pattern. David.B> Erm, _anything_ the dma_pool code does with freed memory is David.B> legal. Glad to see we agree on that! David.B> Anyway, please (a) see if 2.6.4 works for you, and (b) David.B> direct any future followups on this thread _only_ to David.B> linux-usb-devel. The patch that's in 2.6.4 definitely looks like a step in the right direction. I still have some concerns. I'll follow up on linux-usb-devel with more details. Thanks, --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/