Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:53:45 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] riscv: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator
Message-ID: <20190212085345.GA28278@localhost>
References: <20190118140308.9599-1-johan@kernel.org>
 <20190118140308.9599-6-johan@kernel.org>
 <20190212071339.GL26747@infradead.org>
 <20190212082621.GA26912@localhost>
 <6518a7ff-0586-be7a-4a43-6c9a35194a05@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6518a7ff-0586-be7a-4a43-6c9a35194a05@wdc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:47:09AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> On 2/12/19 12:26 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:13:39PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> Use the new for_each_of_cpu_node() helper to iterate over cpu nodes
> >>> instead of open coding. Note that this will allow matching also on the
> >>> node name instead of the (for FDT) deprecated device_type property.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> I think this is going to conflict with the ELF caps changes from
> >> Atish.  Maybe the riscv_fill_hwcap hunk should be included in his
> >> patch?
> > 
> > Since that patch had some issues (e.g. the node reference underflow) it
> > may be better to rebase it on top of this series. The changes are
> > otherwise distinct after all.
> > 
> 
> I have fixed the node reference underflow issue and made some more 
> changes based on comments.
> 
> Some other patches(1,3,4,5) in this series may conflict with my series 
> as well. I can rebase my series on top of yours and send it as one 
> series if that's okay with you and Palmer.

No need for you to resend these patches as they are reviewed any ready
to be merged. Just rebase your series and mention the dependency in the
cover letter as I did with Andreas's patch which this series depended
on.

Thanks,
Johan