Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp3599602imj; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:15:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IY6XFLHxBW9CYste0cttKyN3IefBr5diNYCgvZRubRho5aAViXk3lAt5LYHVYGvQZc5byFd X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc81:: with SMTP id bb1mr2924391plb.223.1549962938894; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:15:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549962938; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nv6KIAdFKGRCxXTTXsV3NEwcXHF07j3mHUNUvy4ghwJ0pseqOG5wLxx3lwbk6uWUSH LfkNlpLD1uY2VTIovXTgFlDAOCS6wY61zChxT+ALxkRZIVXZ09MrV6eThwaB77UnR928 ypHLzfvqnYxgaZC3bqu27R98Ji7isNuiv7Jownk3n+1VjcD+XfjCHHjXIYTqCOYEdIPf cN84zxL+8DfwNNpfEKVhTmgK3UXW+S5FVq57DytfDFaLwRBa3LGzQYGh1c1A8XbQidjf GT58t06AP3uiixvnMednenK01VucdT8en7F1rStlXo6l9P998przeJQNZ6P86LIuuyer ik/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=4aPRHcJ80+QnKnjnwi1RVU/zrQ02pSPfaivnaz+1abc=; b=b2OwypC3Nen8bm/u6qCDW7reFIy1XebH/UhqBn2X3E1Mowcj/q3LjQ+gij7Dzs6unO yszrZHn7sEVMX+mXiqAXovthI2JGONf1WvFUNszTkf9UOGrrkmC5QjJj3IUGGI0YfUin /bisufRAx1XDEaiSjrxfWmzsyRzgRgTqiRwOJc9MsOfA41FipVX13Duz2+EqSoLJLVOJ DvFKM3w00pQhoUEJRUsJoyymxZ34zCoRbwjN7yvbdFdI8/rav0foD5ueo3l7ZZ8dfUbM 8GrygRG3j5qnkwSYkeOXyTh/kFC19wofZJdj0LI69xGP0t6fpzGVaPEmNl+HEpf+PMJQ nZag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 91si13048455pla.89.2019.02.12.01.15.22; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728654AbfBLJPF (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:15:05 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:24428 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726325AbfBLJPF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:15:05 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2019 01:15:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,361,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="125792428" Received: from cli6-desk1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.161.118]) ([10.239.161.118]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2019 01:15:01 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] x86,/proc/pid/status: Add AVX-512 usage elapsed time To: Thomas Gleixner , Aubrey Li Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, ak@linux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190211185931.4386-1-aubrey.li@intel.com> <20190211185931.4386-2-aubrey.li@intel.com> From: "Li, Aubrey" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:14:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/2/12 16:22, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> index d53c54b842da..60ee932070fe 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> @@ -996,5 +996,7 @@ enum l1tf_mitigations { >> }; >> >> extern enum l1tf_mitigations l1tf_mitigation; >> +/* Add support for architecture specific output in /proc/pid/status */ >> +extern void arch_proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task); > > Sigh. This is absolutely the wrong place. The weak function is declared and > used in fs/proc/... So the prototype wants to be in a header which is > included from there independent of x86... Can the prototype be in the architecture header if they want to call the function? Like the following? arch_report_meminfo() is used in fs/proc/... as well. $ find . -name *.h | xargs grep arch_report_meminfo ./arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h:void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m); ./arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h:extern void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m); ./arch/parisc/include/asm/pgtable.h:extern void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m); Thanks, -Aubrey