Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp3765295imj; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:22:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaIEiXF90Mhfz5FLT2G43pwoHAU72WY4GeA9xtaPlISuWe4q7kR7ajeS4/UGCImplD3PcHN X-Received: by 2002:a63:2586:: with SMTP id l128mr3488488pgl.104.1549974131123; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:22:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549974131; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JUG8XgCity5XUd0Q2JXOAwpRF7e7B1rwCDPtjDyYJrf/9v2YU4aWkGkkO7X+F1ES6x kit8UgHSbaqH5o8pCBiQf/Z4SChhMtPGUtLknIlXhGspxN3OO9GQP1uImBfExKKx4ins 0Qjk+1Qu3vETPILiJJ5hZuLd0yrVuINv10eReU2NvMl27pTQdPMoiIyiAujbzka/ks1F VRcpfllCul+fx2nKnYRV7SCcYIe+/NRxy4ZcxXhL6yf03OJU3PxsDU9fl6VQ1prsku4Y Ho8UiNGPLa9sI3++bTqF6I1+SuRLxGHhy92kuUHAXGAzSfjMc5XNJ7/U7xg2T4FyiXNq Du8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=QynzdEsonNfGAvskM6grTZP5oisTKEdT+1lRgwJnZYU=; b=ysms+JltmoNiYS6+tnRfhgAl9RDAIWD/g1AHLf/6ErBBtwUdkfXgwaZBFxABqLpWCG 30ctxI1aQ8BVyNtkB+ASA4PxBedbKP5KkbV9w2KKfKUzSZemzsFYkJ9nZ5esfZP2Y00Z b8WbGOJY1xroPNY7lkIR0msvyWGo2LNy+pEON8F1Ek62g9EqsSMJJLv+qTmuiQEmChao m0/G6/c/5eVSWmAxTrubRWlIUKoHomwNQh64B0ZmZmOSFbqPZZq9pWAlPMOBwyQ59GTW dSb8PzomkAeiYrCCm+b7IeDoYoF/N+6KtEZ4nu/kDseSdLb/bjHpX+PquZWMv3K+gU6g vdDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 98si5357281pls.205.2019.02.12.04.21.55; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:22:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729236AbfBLMVg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:21:36 -0500 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:54712 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726550AbfBLMVg (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:21:36 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,361,1544457600"; d="scan'208";a="54168451" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2019 20:21:34 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.83]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725B14BAD9BE; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:21:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.167.226.60] (10.167.226.60) by G08CNEXCHPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:21:28 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: comments cleanup & indentation fix From: Cao jin To: , , , CC: , References: <20190104120428.26847-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <3a55f276-1247-575e-274b-6336d7dfce36@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:18:36 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190104120428.26847-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.60] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 725B14BAD9BE.A9D20 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/4/19 8:04 PM, Cao jin wrote: > No real code modification, just cleanup: > 1. remove redundant comments which have already appeared above > 2. comments improvement: > "aligned to a 2M boundary" > --> > "aligned up to CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN boundary" Finally I see why I have inaccurate understanding in 2. Sorry for the noise. > 3. typo fix: uncompression --> decompression > 4. indentation fix in linker script: spaces -> tab > I will leave the other 3 alone, unless they are wanted. -- Sincerely, Cao jin