Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp3799454imj; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:00:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYocRn7YgcMaEONW52fRWrkystU4xJEzno3tOJBjfCwBuzk6xo8N4uiN/KnU/tKaLGFLtBT X-Received: by 2002:a63:83:: with SMTP id 125mr3458641pga.343.1549976457669; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:00:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549976457; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=m++8FAyE7bjQKHBvfR7X81ti1K/w8mdAE48FchAZOJzlRfE8JJ8w2Pn6ucl5REBQ3E 7D/FSK60napObtj877wiX5jymgFqZLNmwwq2RwuJjK91gHyNr0RguVJ4lwnb9n3bJJ9U HPQgS/0nfnyAY9d/+CK1ffpHAGppwAZzk+NPBRYHWUnX9zlDuLSiM3dz4jZMMAMmg4R2 HbqNEyrVZw4+y2mKf+jkJxLuAsTIMPyVh7gTrJdG7om/fkiFGIOXLuv+JWRQhPqszkIN +dnuV7QwPS/H5svZ/dcTFaSi5HC0bZmQX0pTe/1054wL7/nKinTauM3v9OU+G6zXtq9C xpGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=VDNXOREDNGYW88RlMWXWe1+fpPoFObQlemG/TN+KLuA=; b=i1NUmaBLX/DKbNdYcLP3PuOp+16gMGx3n21wBNPUjGrJJ/vNWBuq5+zT/TP3bDJSC/ X33HeCtSdYy9jvZCOzdYNbjYlOoNwGDTscrlbbDKJ7e3A0vF6DVzNa+QI26iT3+nl536 0Uw14nkNtxrYQq5dzRaEpuDYKhUuYQFO3HHbHwmzbAVVn65OaTQ/Yrf+JnrZVV33J1s5 v5sSQGQVaw6BNbon8NOBgJyqsqSHPhlOt2O71gxgtqeEizFpMMxBgoI0cjT1fJxSpDh9 Z62UrEwtuSDd3PDfiqL8hS26Z1/JzqZJqeDUmd8fGaoMWPom9Lamq1DXjS3xoBycC9E9 D5+w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=Y7sJeVtR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p13si368863pgc.538.2019.02.12.05.00.37; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=Y7sJeVtR; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728873AbfBLMuc (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:50:32 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:45803 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725916AbfBLMuc (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:50:32 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 32so4036739ota.12 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:50:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VDNXOREDNGYW88RlMWXWe1+fpPoFObQlemG/TN+KLuA=; b=Y7sJeVtRiglF2RvgFGXMXC12YVEM1qnMuaG5u2CnqMtRCX+TEoY32Diq5FGu/iK21d XaxBmvAte7CK3Fx6LdIMz4w9E2yGuvvovTmxS1lkAtTxS4FpnEEiTGJcrHsNf4xZFWWy PTF2aeHPgo+9wPqFmiUfjdWO4rlaap2YO7STY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VDNXOREDNGYW88RlMWXWe1+fpPoFObQlemG/TN+KLuA=; b=W+02x4zYnwx5Qhb/xuRgUF+J6CK325v9S83Z/QTIzspDurHeWwBdm9kRwo3b6dxIbs I74BfDwyeqtX4/sWEbs5jsyALACsm2gjdN4SC3Kr7++eVT6Y8CdF5Macq8WSfENtWoWk 1kIao7XCMdGJyFewFS7noJJH/wDId9/2nFbRAGZlTWnhgD7Dac5rvVWmp9Zy8L2vVkG0 UDpFwWron45hPptWM0kmkG3xWNCFbnxq/Xe4+eJxjnpkX+oN+IDQLh1xhyKBSJTgpsLM wd6YdUaPdETLFEhJD0rzWycI02g8WC9FifsUt+wl0yrGkMojOqLDYmv6pAzTFZAiUMne 5LCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaaQpHPoXrMtzAOdB6oLDoFh+zq4InxZMonUm0jzfjeZCZvCrv5 JnCYh3suxKVd4rHSk/E2U7QMfMTsGv0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3426:: with SMTP id v35mr3851265otb.71.1549975831357; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:50:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com. [209.85.210.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm5225587otp.69.2019.02.12.04.50.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:50:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id n71so4114702ota.10 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:50:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6f8e:: with SMTP id h14mr3388599otq.241.1549975829538; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:50:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tomasz Figa Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:50:18 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] media: cedrus: Add H264 decoding support To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Hans Verkuil , Alexandre Courbot , Sakari Ailus , Laurent Pinchart , Pawel Osciak , Paul Kocialkowski , Chen-Yu Tsai , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel ," , Linux Media Mailing List , Nicolas Dufresne , jenskuske@gmail.com, Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Thomas Petazzoni Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Maxime, On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a new version of the H264 decoding support in the cedrus > driver. Thanks for working on this. Please see my comments below. > > As you might already know, the cedrus driver relies on the Request > API, and is a reverse engineered driver for the video decoding engine > found on the Allwinner SoCs. > > This work has been possible thanks to the work done by the people > behind libvdpau-sunxi found here: > https://github.com/linux-sunxi/libvdpau-sunxi/ > > I've tested the various ABI using this gdb script: > http://code.bulix.org/jl4se4-505620?raw > > And this test script: > http://code.bulix.org/8zle4s-505623?raw > > The application compiled is quite trivial: > http://code.bulix.org/e34zp8-505624?raw > > The output is: > arm: builds/arm-test-v4l2-h264-structures > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > x86: builds/x86-test-v4l2-h264-structures > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > x64: builds/x64-test-v4l2-h264-structures > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > arm64: builds/arm64-test-v4l2-h264-structures > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > > Let me know if there's any flaw using that test setup, or if you have > any comments on the patches. > > Maxime > > Changes from v2: > - Simplified _cedrus_write_ref_list as suggested by Jernej > - Set whether the frame is used as reference using nal_ref_idc > - Respect chroma_format_idc > - Fixes for the scaling list and prediction tables > - Wrote the documentation for the flags > - Added a bunch of defines to the driver bit fields > - Reworded the controls and data format descriptions as suggested > by Hans > - Reworked the controls' structure field size to avoid padding > - Removed the long term reference flag This and... > - Reintroduced the neighbor info buffer > - Removed the ref_pic_list_p0/b0/b1 arrays that are redundant with the > one in the DPB these are used in our Rockchip VDEC driver. Could you elaborate on the reasons why they got removed? Best regards, Tomasz