Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190119132650.9978-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> <20190119132650.9978-7-anup.patel@wdc.com>
 <20190212070807.GD26747@infradead.org> <CAAhSdy1NED22YyYrAJDqPkDqT1c2ms2QC9OjHP0qLwHT+o2zvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <mvmva1ps369.fsf@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <mvmva1ps369.fsf@suse.de>
From:   Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:23:39 +0530
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy3HKnOs=aE75+Unor-wg-mELC-Oua7WdyDavpUgJmGAng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] RISC-V: Implement keepinitrd kernel parameter
To:     Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:07 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Feb 12 2019, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> wrote:
>
> > So in case of initrd we might not want to free-up the RAM but
> > we can certainly free-up in case of initramfs.
>
> But the default should be keepinitrd=0, shoudn't it?

Actually, it is keepinitrd=0 by default but the commit description
is reverse. I will fix the commit description.

Regards,
Anup