Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20190212.095030.1445077555795164973.davem@davemloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@gmail.com
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@mellanox.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jiri@mellanox.com,
        andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Remove getting
 SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS
From:   David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190211211749.19847-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
References: <20190211211749.19847-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800

> AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
> switchdev_port_attr_set().
> 
> This is effectively no doing anything and it can slow down future work
> that tries to make modifications in these areas so remove that.

Series applied.

> David, there should be no dependency with previous patch series, but
> again, feedback from Ido and Jiri would be welcome in case this was
> added for a reason.

Ok, is there going to be another respin of that switchdev_ops removal
series?