Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp4547692imj; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:03:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYw8Ftye7FPZw1gkDMabeJ/4TYZqvXoxUgiwoK6AqALx0V1kW+DQdVH56hxfunRuSQIXvZB X-Received: by 2002:a63:ff60:: with SMTP id s32mr6637860pgk.266.1550027009123; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:03:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550027009; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YsAye1gXK7IZTo2x6ajwgQpgHhCV/wD/9AVOHGSKgf5TXlla0Xm8u2OQMC+8KUSLuB I1YK/QgKBNjcQTdq/BhE1rMFc80wmvNJCvU4Cjo3OCuM2tQwlW9sYP7sUG/51nLq/20j LUN7/BxcqpN9lhZhrnvHTjt1KpgJSBdaQNQW4+h1Uj+xiOXe/vKEeB8lcWkg4AMNe2+H TN48BU9/Y36N/gKWsrfBQSjoRR15jAGRTcz3oVGsAxr1qe8TaH9TDTSn17++rkczzWGH KUdkKBq972yAA+b8u7g+o71CTa/X9UdjnoXhRHvmnxoMsQzLANQyEDtuTkRplEp52Th3 Liag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=PMU1/TQWCnMHC5lCOveXcIzdUREG8BzeB87IXaJ0KOE=; b=p8ijCepuodwG3d+9YyUo+pY4xKI13qTT0wbwYqL8+t2xdx9J7QE5y9muWGY5WxnlWP ADjH7Di7YCGFaKCr4ixZJzNHNp99XSzLNQ8e5q28xrwNICGE67ildBZemB+hQKXesFPW SbM54gb+pAtqbGRSDTDP/SCMy71Yjq6t5nZWjICJjoJ+8nUOLMHC7eL3SZqYC0VD6TYk cMdEwe8qNDvZp0vtoYGPCG6bivMF+5ySKMEXwC9kGmG/MDkAyfu6o2bX40ihGUXZ0vZZ H3mUO/Z7FvScz4/Wpu7JTmslI6KJuGfgocVvuSjkCEfk8imuckoZ3rLe+MCpELR127sY pu7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=SuJwfuys; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z2si585498plk.278.2019.02.12.19.03.12; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=SuJwfuys; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390349AbfBMDC0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:02:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f66.google.com ([209.85.210.66]:39302 "EHLO mail-ot1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387830AbfBMDCZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:02:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f66.google.com with SMTP id n8so1551772otl.6 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:02:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PMU1/TQWCnMHC5lCOveXcIzdUREG8BzeB87IXaJ0KOE=; b=SuJwfuysL5A18uM8XkhFSpoUC6sFu7YwyqKGwB8V6xhIckAUCFxXlYmZHliwI/1+M9 kpR3EVmH2YQgoTaz3syhgYb7fOG5EU7KP+77YblsaXfDgo/zpuLfFGr+Em4olflplBCB drpoRRwFZAd45owdGvzyz/GORgOmZK5KEQMPg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PMU1/TQWCnMHC5lCOveXcIzdUREG8BzeB87IXaJ0KOE=; b=JdNwLsaUE+dlQYACl4LJhSAg97oRuz7vXxpfxrZjkmfIN8Mx+B4nRK5i3c3BIAThEp 04bjHNUxMrxcR/GzbmN9Kk8bJ2OzpAINw/2e7x6L5VSbfsQb+3+QCK1zI9q4TdiemFUq RT687XMiKKHOPb3zmYRHM6BqOKBNy9pXHUctKs03nWnifad3KpynJ4+U32+ki9LbU5FY cEUjrKMjGcUPHahWerBKuFBZsJr7MxN0Uvq8LrPfTMbI7w1AAk3drxIF3//XgZWn9pu4 asVf50HGJpA1u7z12V57uojQ4adrRvdXx2m/z84a00YEh+maoLF/FUtoI9Og53dhaMIw PN+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubhGPWBqvQMGUBoPIXtjVkn9PEBVQqGahqkUEe5vZDgv5BgRaqP 72TOAOZBfaKfrFhs0EkDKOOgfNYFsf8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:11cd:: with SMTP id v13mr4717559otq.157.1550026942888; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:02:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com. [209.85.210.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p81sm2176731oia.58.2019.02.12.19.02.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id i20so1606556otl.0 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:02:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7e8b:: with SMTP id m11mr7286136otp.80.1550026939459; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:02:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4a1346315224850faf31345b577ce3a29c069f3a.camel@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <4a1346315224850faf31345b577ce3a29c069f3a.camel@collabora.com> From: Tomasz Figa Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:02:08 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] media: cedrus: Add H264 decoding support To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Maxime Ripard , Hans Verkuil , Alexandre Courbot , Sakari Ailus , Laurent Pinchart , Pawel Osciak , Paul Kocialkowski , Chen-Yu Tsai , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel ," , Linux Media Mailing List , Nicolas Dufresne , jenskuske@gmail.com, Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Thomas Petazzoni Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 6:22 AM Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Hey Tomasz, > > On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 21:50 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Maxime, > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39 PM Maxime Ripard > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Here is a new version of the H264 decoding support in the cedrus > > > driver. > > > > Thanks for working on this. Please see my comments below. > > > > > As you might already know, the cedrus driver relies on the Request > > > API, and is a reverse engineered driver for the video decoding engine > > > found on the Allwinner SoCs. > > > > > > This work has been possible thanks to the work done by the people > > > behind libvdpau-sunxi found here: > > > https://github.com/linux-sunxi/libvdpau-sunxi/ > > > > > > I've tested the various ABI using this gdb script: > > > http://code.bulix.org/jl4se4-505620?raw > > > > > > And this test script: > > > http://code.bulix.org/8zle4s-505623?raw > > > > > > The application compiled is quite trivial: > > > http://code.bulix.org/e34zp8-505624?raw > > > > > > The output is: > > > arm: builds/arm-test-v4l2-h264-structures > > > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > > > x86: builds/x86-test-v4l2-h264-structures > > > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > > > x64: builds/x64-test-v4l2-h264-structures > > > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > > > arm64: builds/arm64-test-v4l2-h264-structures > > > SHA1: 88cbf7485ba81831fc3b93772b215599b3b38318 > > > > > > Let me know if there's any flaw using that test setup, or if you have > > > any comments on the patches. > > > > > > Maxime > > > > > > Changes from v2: > > > - Simplified _cedrus_write_ref_list as suggested by Jernej > > > - Set whether the frame is used as reference using nal_ref_idc > > > - Respect chroma_format_idc > > > - Fixes for the scaling list and prediction tables > > > - Wrote the documentation for the flags > > > - Added a bunch of defines to the driver bit fields > > > - Reworded the controls and data format descriptions as suggested > > > by Hans > > > - Reworked the controls' structure field size to avoid padding > > > - Removed the long term reference flag > > > > This and... > > > > Maxime has dropped this because of Ayaka's mail about long term references > not making much sense in stateless decoders. I haven't seen any argument confirming that thesis, though. I should have kicked in earlier, sorry. > > I noticed that RK3399 TRM has a field to specify long term refs and > so was wondering about this item as well. > > > > - Reintroduced the neighbor info buffer > > > - Removed the ref_pic_list_p0/b0/b1 arrays that are redundant with the > > > one in the DPB > > > > these are used in our Rockchip VDEC driver. > > > > Could you elaborate on the reasons why they got removed? > > > > If I understood correctly, there are two reference picture lists. > P-frames will populate ref_pic_list0 and B-frames will populate both. > > According to this, v4l2_ctrl_h264_slice_param.ref_pic_list0 and .ref_pic_list1 > should be enough and ref_pic_list_p0/b0/b1 are not needed. > > What do you think? The lists in v4l2_ctrl_h264_slice_param are expected to be past the per-slice modification stage (which is quite complicated and better done in userspace), while the ones in v4l2_ctrl_h264_decode_param just in the original order. Rockchip VPU expects them in the original order and does the modification in the hardware. Best regards, Tomasz