Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:17:11 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, peterz@infradead.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 05/10] kprobes: Search non-suffixed symbol in
 blacklist
Message-ID: <20190213071711.GB121801@gmail.com>
References: <154998785011.31052.1475728497912659748.stgit@devbox>
 <154998799234.31052.6136378903570418008.stgit@devbox>
 <20190213071316.GA121801@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190213071316.GA121801@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Newer gcc can generate some different instances of a function
> > with suffixed symbols if the function is optimized and only
> > has a part of that. (e.g. .constprop, .part etc.)
> > 
> > In this case, it is not enough to check the entry of kprobe
> > blacklist because it only records non-suffixed symbol address.
> > 
> > To fix this issue, search non-suffixed symbol in blacklist if
> > given address is within a symbol which has a suffix.
> > 
> > Note that this can cause false positive cases if a kprobe-safe
> > function is optimized to suffixed instance and has same name
> > symbol which is blacklisted.
> > But I would like to chose a fail-safe design for this issue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Why did you not add Steven's Reviewed-by tag?

The series looks fine otherwise, so I applied it with Steve's reviewed-by 
tag added.

Thanks,

	Ingo