Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261787AbUCKWZi (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:25:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261793AbUCKWZi (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:25:38 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:10690 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261787AbUCKWZ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:25:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:25:15 -0800 From: Mark Wong To: Bill Davidsen Cc: linux-lvm@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lvm2 performance data with linux-2.6 Message-ID: <20040311142515.A27177@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Davidsen , linux-lvm@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200403081916.i28JGgE25794@mail.osdl.org> <4050E453.3010809@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4050E453.3010809@tmr.com>; from davidsen@tmr.com on Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:12:35PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1619 Lines: 35 On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > markw@osdl.org wrote: > > I've started collecting various data (including oprofile) using our > > DBT-2 (OLTP) workload with lvm2 on linux 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 on ia32 and > > ia64 platforms: > > http://developer.osdl.org/markw/lvm2/ > > > > So far I've only varied the stripe width with lvm, from 8 KB to 512 KB, > > for PostgreSQL that is using 8 KB sized blocks with ext2. It appears > > that a stripe width of 16 KB through 128KB on the ia64 system gives the > > best throughput for the DBT-2 workload on a volume that should be doing > > mostly sequential writes. > > > > I'm going to run through more tests varying the block size that > > PostgreSQL uses, but I wanted to share what I had so far in case there > > were other suggestions or recommendations. > > > Here's one thought: look at the i/o rates on individual drives using > each stripe size. You *might* see that one size does far fewer seeks > than others, which is a secondary thing to optimize after throughput IMHO. > > If you don't have a tool for this I can send you the latest diorate > which does stuff like this, io rate perdrive or per partition, something > I occasionally find revealing. Yeah, please do send me a copy. I'd be interested to see what that might turn up. I've just been using iostat -x so far. Thanks, Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/