Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org,
        andy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@intel.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190213150810.32750-1-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
 <20190213150810.32750-7-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
 <20190213152326.GA1883@zn.tnic>
 <308aa852-b2c3-3336-707f-d54de6ad77b7@linux.intel.com>
 <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic>
From:   "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <d1d8a2fb-f8f9-7712-d53f-fac4bb2065a8@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:05:18 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

I sure did, perhaps it wasn't clear in my response. I can remove 
coreboot link in next version but please clarify whether i should keep 
other link that i mentioned or just keep the commit without any link?

On 13-Feb-19 9:34 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:13:01PM +0530, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote:
>> Icelake related information is  available here https://www.intel.in/content/www/in/en/design/products-and-solutions/processors-and-chipsets/ice-lake/overview.html
>> but it may require a login either with Intel or a Partner ID.
>>
>> The CPUID mentioned in this document is 0x706E0 which is same as per this
>> coreboot link.
> You did not read what I wrote.
>