Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org,
        andy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@intel.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190213150810.32750-1-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
 <20190213150810.32750-7-rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
 <20190213152326.GA1883@zn.tnic>
 <308aa852-b2c3-3336-707f-d54de6ad77b7@linux.intel.com>
 <20190213160405.GC1883@zn.tnic>
 <d1d8a2fb-f8f9-7712-d53f-fac4bb2065a8@linux.intel.com>
 <46ad3b08-b96b-6ef2-a5e4-fb0865865916@intel.com>
From:   "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <1836a770-86ce-fc34-f7fd-6d1692fa184a@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:43:30 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <46ad3b08-b96b-6ef2-a5e4-fb0865865916@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 13-Feb-19 10:10 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/13/19 8:35 AM, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote:
>> I sure did, perhaps it wasn't clear in my response. I can remove
>> coreboot link in next version but please clarify whether i should keep
>> other link that i mentioned or just keep the commit without any link?
> I think we're hearing loud and clear from the maintainers that they
> prefer *public*, official documentation from Intel to back up our patches.
>
> Barring that, they'd rather have no link than a link to some other
> random project.

Thank you Dave for the clarification.

Hi Borislav, I realize that the link i mentioned is not public. 
Apologies for creating confusion around that and for the previous top 
posting.  I will drop references to the coreboot link too in the next 
version.

>