Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190213100309.03b5ea58@canb.auug.org.au> <CAErSpo5vmvx8QcQoEGzvN+5sWbL1syr2c5hD9AJwW3FGJ=8Hyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190214070958.058aaf32@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20190214070958.058aaf32@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:19:32 -0600
Message-ID: <CAErSpo41bDxfajDJFH1AQK0ZwX=fC2jnay8Y5CyaS0f=+9LOHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the pci tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:10 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:31:46 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Are these and similar warnings generated by commit hooks or similar
> > scripts?  If so, do you publish them somewhere?  I'd like to be able
> > to set up commit hooks to catch things like this before they get to
> > you.
>
> I run the attached script over the new commits in each tree each day ...

Thanks, I guess now I have no more excuse :)

Is the "missing a Signed-off-by from their committer" thing that I
regularly trip over a manual check?

Bjorn