Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp1616444imj; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:12:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iat0DvRW5H73ilKsayAXUgrgXlQCNMCvOHZyDBEU1KMN7axYN2jGmC9beMGI6j4Wfa6AETg X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8016:: with SMTP id j22mr5063506pfi.259.1550164367288; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:12:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550164367; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mMpFhWawMyBu0lcYr5wj9Si9hdYX81FTn+Kla0OIdhgUYFZtPbbsZcqRwYfEtE8bTO 0iqi3JCSxrVcs8I/TFt9KpQ9RZP5q3OSOI4Wuo8RFWCYSTmvlMKPY9gijPHCmRhDuXaE XaZHuN4wxBBkkgjWoUIrn0wscYp2yL+HLD6Atjva85Hkc/4dZXL73P0soxGjst7ufoyp +l9rE9DOD5BhGzzMksB0maUDxcnp+3MBDC2TOSZC9WsTll0dyG94P1ixJ9q8R51ePQzY JLxgpZzUo7YNFKgqwIMkFxdhsRfITcA1Q7wawyHll6CQfUB5nbTNNrU6OHhuLIAa3NzB kIsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=VENC8v9mY6WZb6B+sTwMNU60FvNVkMw2RKZTfnskQDM=; b=ImVGnOQFXQRsLyisKmjMGOZ3/ER+tClrLN5JPhIATTxu2t2LWXN8PShHEGK/X51Ouh tdQG7dviSAAbREgSP0zLzKD2p1HuYDPM589BqeEsQqgNd+7Nduo/hixrodQMwPlait6g Ru3JrL0PDAW/3OCEbWqZxrXBg+VEh1x0/aQIsVKPC5Q+HyEKrViNcXAtxWQ1NhN88zWB ydBax7LDsK+RhnPQwpAIYIsYL/cq3vvLlH1Ne9qPFP0i+qflF+MkTZTymsNpy7rhLr72 DG/2FhDsz8ziPdN/EtH9hg3Qw21MIgdfFKTb00CkmXxQfn0dXbUIt6S+F3G8Y2hhMXbm Jnww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p23si2889559plo.7.2019.02.14.09.12.31; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2437664AbfBNIvC (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 03:51:02 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39008 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2436834AbfBNIvC (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 03:51:02 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7E7EBD; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:51:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.197.45] (e112298-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7D303F575; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:50:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/17] V4.19 backport of more 32-bit arm spectre patches To: David Long , stable@vger.kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Florian Fainelli , Tony Lindgren , Marc Zyngier , Greg KH , Mark Rutland Cc: Will Deacon , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20190213213223.916-1-dave.long@linaro.org> From: Julien Thierry Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 08:50:55 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190213213223.916-1-dave.long@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On 13/02/2019 21:32, David Long wrote: > From: "David A. Long" > > V4.19 backport of spectre patches from Russell M. King's spectre branch. > Patches have been kvm-unit-test'ed on an arndale, run through kernelci, and > handed off to ARM for functional testing. > I've reviewed the backports. For Spectre-v1.1 I also checked we do get the expected code sequence in the generated image at the expected locations. So, for patches 1 to 10: Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry For Spectre-v2 big.Little patches, I managed to test this on TC2 and can confirm CPUs pick up the correct mitigation method. So, for patches 11 to 17: Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry Tested-by: Julien Thierry Thanks, -- Julien Thierry