Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp55514imj; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:14:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZqd3pUwh7MjTBcws6pSdnlqwhPL9GKUBfAj88h+LbJL6k8e1rsR/mIS/eWw+8LMz5EiDfi X-Received: by 2002:a63:f74c:: with SMTP id f12mr2368530pgk.195.1550186048645; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:14:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550186048; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jaoTqRdfFYuzFcE75398EtiEeyUAimwGL16WIVE6INZ3PJZnOfNu8oFNNMZCMrcfgD mWrBajkAI4A7kEjikkkkkJhWyYqO0d36a5ze/jLIovW3+ef2QNcpJz1kBJyl5W5CSs9R MLIQW62jZcwFkYpErekHqP0hmY+sWQ4MmCL0hTamYesT1AnynigemPrxZEaaK53dRzBB BAe/fPSDAKWf7GfWVNW6q8G1975+OdVb4KmPNdm+9ZTBnpZHTliaeTErYkUxtPM/A31N TObotoIRuW65Kwp50rH9TYSaSowWpBaCkujz7wMf51Qgc24cMbdEeSZa/BZPbpGBNgjE 4/JA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=0cWYbAmU9EvddH0rIBCkodcCo6FMQHQyxuPlazyG8Fo=; b=cLXbFi+OoYeRklsgd3RgDhR1SS7fqQxuhe7to3ID6nHPscLaXOmUfzmJIjcNopHH7Z KoQyO9UZR0Tf6mX+3kxITfHVuCADoZRBhLMoXEly2U0l7yu04U1fTeobJ3eJ+kTgC8Q2 /lRhiRGDGRt1QaupPiBMfSkz52cTGqp5PmzOdJ8QNTjphz0nbsAShZ3AHVxnnVw4SOjI ncdzbmLIz3kr0wU8tTZLlthktF8+CfzoUyWX0kMar7RqdmDIDJAcGHAx3WbqzJXfo422 EDDeAUne5kfyq8qPjOAibr2piGnoE6+sXNQmvn/3yIoV8Mo8VtgszUYsRVIVmI5S1Lv2 2pHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l3si3374332pgp.285.2019.02.14.15.13.52; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:14:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394446AbfBNM0m (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 07:26:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54824 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727958AbfBNM0m (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 07:26:42 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E42D80F79; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.161]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C565F9AA; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:26:38 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Song Liu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, peterz@infradead.org, acme@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf, bpf: save bpf_prog_info in a rbtree in perf_env Message-ID: <20190214122638.GD26714@krava> References: <20190209011705.2160185-1-songliubraving@fb.com> <20190209011705.2160185-6-songliubraving@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190209011705.2160185-6-songliubraving@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 05:17:01PM -0800, Song Liu wrote: SNIP > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h > index d01b8355f4ca..5894a177b7cf 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h > @@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ > #define __PERF_ENV_H > > #include > +#include > #include "cpumap.h" > +#include "rwsem.h" > +#include "bpf-event.h" > > struct cpu_topology_map { > int socket_id; > @@ -64,6 +67,8 @@ struct perf_env { > struct memory_node *memory_nodes; > unsigned long long memory_bsize; > u64 clockid_res_ns; > + struct rw_semaphore bpf_info_lock; why's the lock needed? jirka