Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262169AbUCLPFw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:05:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262170AbUCLPFw (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:05:52 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:51589 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262169AbUCLPFe (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:05:34 -0500 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16465.53692.106520.847235@laputa.namesys.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:05:32 +0300 To: Nick Piggin Cc: Matthias Urlichs , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.4-rc2-mm1: vm-split-active-lists In-Reply-To: <4051C5F1.2050605@cyberone.com.au> References: <404FACF4.3030601@cyberone.com.au> <200403111825.22674@WOLK> <40517E47.3010909@cyberone.com.au> <20040312012703.69f2bb9b.akpm@osdl.org> <4051B0C6.2070302@cyberone.com.au> <4051C5F1.2050605@cyberone.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2086 Lines: 57 Nick Piggin writes: > [...] > > By the way, I would be interested to know the rationale behind > mark_page_accessed as it is without this patch, also what is it doing in > rmap.c (I know hardly anything actually uses page_test_and_clear_young, but > still). It seems to me like it only serves to make VM behaviour harder to > understand, but I'm probably missing something. Andrew? With your patch, once a page got into inactive list, its PG_referenced bit will only be checked by VM scanner when page wanders to the tail of list. In particular, if is impossible to tell pages that were accessed only once while on inactive list from ones that were accessed multiple times. Original mark_page_accessed() moves page to the active list on the second access, thus making it less eligible for the reclaim. I actually tried quite an opposite modification: (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/misc-patches/unsupported/extra/2004.03.10-2.6.4-rc3/a_1[5678]*) /* roughly, modulo locking, etc. */ void fastcall mark_page_accessed(struct page *page) { if (!PageReferenced(page)) SetPageReferenced(page); else if (!PageLRU(page)) continue; else if (!PageActive(page)) { /* page is on inactive list */ del_page_from_inactive_list(zone, page); SetPageActive(page); add_page_to_active_list(zone, page); inc_page_state(pgactivate); ClearPageReferenced(page); } else { /* page is on active list, move it to head */ list_move(&page->lru, &zone->active_list); ClearPageReferenced(page); } } That is, referenced and active page is moved to head of the active list. While somewhat improving file system performance it badly affects anonymous memory, because (it seems) file system pages tend to push mapped ones out of active list. Probably it should have better effect with your split active lists. > Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/