Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262518AbUCLUyY (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:54:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262508AbUCLUxk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:53:40 -0500 Received: from imap.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:18575 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262515AbUCLUwR (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:52:17 -0500 X-Authenticated: #1226656 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:52:15 +0100 From: Marc Giger To: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.4 on Alpha uninterruptible sleep of processes Message-Id: <20040312215215.1041889a@hdg.gigerstyle.ch> In-Reply-To: <20040312224649.A750@den.park.msu.ru> References: <20040312154613.7567adab@hdg.gigerstyle.ch> <20040312182754.A680@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040312184115.B680@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20040312165907.626d4a08@hdg.gigerstyle.ch> <20040312224649.A750@den.park.msu.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 49 On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:46:49 +0300 Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 04:59:07PM +0100, Marc Giger wrote: > > Too late. Already applied, compiled and booted. Read your message > > and rebooted to 2.4:-) > > Well, you can try the appended patch to see whether it's > a semaphore problem or not. > BTW, what alpha system do you have? Right now I'm recompiling the kernel. So you say this patch isn't a fix but a test? This time I have additionally "semaphore debugging" enabled, perhaps it's useful for you. I will inform you as soon as I get new infos. > > > Why is there no option to compile a preemptive kernel? Not possible > > on alpha or nobody interested to code or...? > > The answer is here: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397 That's no answer, that's a statement:-) Do know the exactly reason why it should be a bad idea? Is it mostly a bad idea on alpha? > > > In 2.4.23 /prc/meminfo shows always > > > > Buffers: 0 kB > > > > Is it normal on alpha? 2.6.4 showed a value > 0 > > No idea. In 2.4.25 I have a non-zero value as well: > Buffers: 7288 kB Interestingly. I'm still waiting to the acl patch for 2.4.25. I think I will rediff it myself. Thank you for your work! Regards Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/