Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262978AbUCMBz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:55:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262977AbUCMBz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:55:29 -0500 Received: from dragnfire.mtl.istop.com ([66.11.160.179]:29891 "EHLO dsl.commfireservices.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262978AbUCMBz0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:55:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:55:22 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: Urban Widmark Cc: Adam Sampson , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: smbfs Oops with Linux 2.6.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 853 Lines: 25 On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Urban Widmark wrote: > Not quite there yet. > > I have added a sleep(10); in send_fs_socket (smbmount) to give me time to > send other requests to the fs. Here is what I get when I run the mount and > two 'ls' in parallel: Thanks for testing it, i'll have another go at it. > The difference must be that in a the inode data for the root inode is not > considered current when the second ls runs, but I don't understand why the > readdir is printed before the getattr. I don't understand why to expect the getattr before the readdir, perhaps you can elaborate for me? Thanks, Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/