Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 05/92] ACPI: NUMA: Use correct type for printing addresses on i386-PAE
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:42:08 +0100
Message-Id: <20190218133455.111633430@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190218133454.668268457@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190218133454.668268457@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit b9ced18acf68dffebe6888c7ec765a2b1db7a039 ]

The addresses of NUMA nodes are not printed correctly on i386-PAE
which is misleading.

Here is a debian9-32bit with PAE in a QEMU guest having more than 4G
of memory:

qemu-system-i386 \
-hda /var/lib/libvirt/images/debian32.qcow2 \
-m 5G \
-enable-kvm \
-smp 10 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=0,cpus=0 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=1,cpus=1 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=2,cpus=2 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=3,cpus=3 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=4,cpus=4 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=5,cpus=5 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=6,cpus=6 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=7,cpus=7 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=8,cpus=8 \
-numa node,mem=512M,nodeid=9,cpus=9 \
-serial stdio

Because of the wrong value type, it prints as below:

[    0.021049] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0xa0000) in proximity domain 0 enabled
[    0.021740] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000 length 0x1ff00000) in proximity domain 0 enabled
[    0.022425] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 1 enabled
[    0.023092] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 2 enabled
[    0.023764] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 3 enabled
[    0.024431] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x80000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 4 enabled
[    0.025104] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0xa0000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 5 enabled
[    0.025791] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 6 enabled
[    0.026412] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 7 enabled
[    0.027118] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 8 enabled
[    0.027802] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 9 enabled

The upper half of the start address of the NUMA domains between 6
and 9 inclusive was cut, so the printed values are incorrect.

Fix the value type, to get the correct values in the log as follows:

[    0.023698] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x0 length 0xa0000) in proximity domain 0 enabled
[    0.024325] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000 length 0x1ff00000) in proximity domain 0 enabled
[    0.024981] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x20000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 1 enabled
[    0.025659] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x40000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 2 enabled
[    0.026317] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x60000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 3 enabled
[    0.026980] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x80000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 4 enabled
[    0.027635] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0xa0000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 5 enabled
[    0.028311] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x100000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 6 enabled
[    0.028985] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x120000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 7 enabled
[    0.029667] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x140000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 8 enabled
[    0.030334] ACPI: SRAT Memory (0x160000000 length 0x20000000) in proximity domain 9 enabled

Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/numa.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
index 274699463b4f..7bbbf8256a41 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
@@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
 		{
 			struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *p =
 			    (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)header;
-			pr_debug("SRAT Memory (0x%lx length 0x%lx) in proximity domain %d %s%s%s\n",
-				 (unsigned long)p->base_address,
-				 (unsigned long)p->length,
+			pr_debug("SRAT Memory (0x%llx length 0x%llx) in proximity domain %d %s%s%s\n",
+				 (unsigned long long)p->base_address,
+				 (unsigned long long)p->length,
 				 p->proximity_domain,
 				 (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_ENABLED) ?
 				 "enabled" : "disabled",
-- 
2.19.1