Received: by 2002:ac0:946b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j40csp2739500imj; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ia8rpFcpywClsFqxm86pY9Fn0vcRITfNBQNmX39zS40lyQ3kfbCsxz1Ua09dGdyVqV8EDwK X-Received: by 2002:a63:545:: with SMTP id 66mr19940801pgf.102.1550517331674; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550517331; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Tt8a/CPGkOBvRs8Ds0jwJRjnjQfXMW58shoiGd9vz4KMP9aknj8toUyuzELCT1avoa lnzLAnc46bZvaYFTawASDD8IPA4DGNeS+Wob7TpNpHflCkvZcLvS/xJbN4rS03ivQSkp RV2RTpOSjLSBcwasD95bGLfgKc9/3AcE+vgZ53tWV5TnF0ZWM/8HkgDRltUDvayQWQUd 4fbJFSYqmr2YAXJw/Asr8glKM6duYpz0HypfWdQLGnJ20jrCsDs+/8EftPQTA4wMFq9t x9ueqlHsR6QTsmzt4KRQ6VMAlthR+thV3CEZ8c07kQtPWkbTaDRRror7vrmH+svFtRKr jEnQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=rYbDxDTwUu2yrm6JgBKdUU5YZs5vkL9CyT6m74b4Ti4=; b=uadGkjT3AyfEk1che2Isr2Tr0HteMRSmKqYNQ40ryvSOlfJ7l3XVYjGnPZsF4VdCiq F+ZnTTpb8ZvhpvX9BNesy3asC2CAkpMfn8vkJClBLMaT+7DQogk/UdZ0hpk6MSbbdad0 SrXhcnCiD1vqsrYiSAleKN+nnawJHB5GHqdr2KizuSWnbvnX2KjwBKth8pwcjY3yFFkH yHiDmsgPb02SY8D7QhobuFO+zogz27LvhVlInBIwVAwjnm2DHpDCQT1vy3V/6GyRFlU2 GO4bTkOknhTO9Gwxs5x/2xg6W9Nxmd9blZ/iLIHwKaRhjTEL73Y/STcePOw+Z66U8r85 zBsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=jYzVN+uB; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a2si3800173pga.476.2019.02.18.11.15.16; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=jYzVN+uB; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391986AbfBRSRo (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:17:44 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:41504 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388706AbfBRSRm (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:17:42 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id t7so13423496otk.8 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:17:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rYbDxDTwUu2yrm6JgBKdUU5YZs5vkL9CyT6m74b4Ti4=; b=jYzVN+uBVs18izFqV6joX1r8ruccLW+zeO4xjUPI6KR4zY3Lz3/hh6PGGWeR0vHKRa 727qdgmLGJzJKOaW++ugjxK8ETqc5KtdTMB2NSFmdZKVD4cXLQMiOLna6sgE3YbPs0Um vRZjOrt80ktWBl2+wxVs0KB5zSvZSXuqXRfj3LElIe0GgRFK0Yb81qMuzoXzB82MgBqF V9WqIo6ilobACH2PGgNr0UI8FwWDoq0OcdNbOCyK9t62hSUIJ4aJ2JScr3UU6nfU7bGT wqFYNDc06CMIP6m3vbPDC46SHJzqS3PL8nCpRhdIvieQUuz9Gj66fZbJkJCXJ6MDhpv7 IRjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rYbDxDTwUu2yrm6JgBKdUU5YZs5vkL9CyT6m74b4Ti4=; b=mq8pW7BkRyWvKZQ+oFpglvtzE0UbknKrHS7wi1aPGw4tCTc2YvCPfljnowWbszbAxG xPJuSydr4R9w2gHczznAto8PkdK4orBKojUogBvAFImYgB3plvXuIx9dmqiZ0ktrjOsu AFNjd3EFRINI9sxTQy3A9/PAErDN3eRYPbNODsN140R6mCxSyUarcA3Z4eHnsn5SkLMZ FA3vfEgnM6vbZ1uixHVVDh/nkziw/19sGmjNETOP6xuO5x+3EsyFCgaZlu97/rjJ8HDB asFAMKusvWf6UNLXjrzFAF0dLTrLz/16K9eslD5qSd0/TOauzMjpJmKEZLqrAWJyQpxc jrnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYpQ4vF5axJoDf12aKwb89/XvQyy6wpRuDuBeD3fFEVRZqq05Tv JCh9V2rF2axJyJJbpuG1a6rkZYEGJv9sUxZxyshcF0U3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1c1:: with SMTP id r1mr6242760ota.229.1550513861162; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:17:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3eb67ffa-76c9-aa66-d162-d4e209330f48@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3eb67ffa-76c9-aa66-d162-d4e209330f48@gmail.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:17:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] The end of the DAX experiment To: Ric Wheeler Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-nvdimm , linux-xfs , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:29 PM Ric Wheeler wrote: > > On 2/6/19 4:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > Before people get too excited this isn't a proposal to kill DAX. The > > topic proposal is a discussion to resolve lingering open questions > > that currently motivate ext4 and xfs to scream "EXPERIMENTAL" when the > > current DAX facilities are enabled. The are 2 primary concerns to > > resolve. Enumerate the remaining features/fixes, and identify a path > > to implement it all without regressing any existing application use > > cases. > > > > An enumeration of remaining projects follows, please expand this list > > if I missed something: > > > > * "DAX" has no specific meaning by itself, users have 2 use cases for > > "DAX" capabilities: userspace cache management via MAP_SYNC, and page > > cache avoidance where the latter aspect of DAX has no current api to > > discover / use it. The project is to supplement MAP_SYNC with a > > MAP_DIRECT facility and MADV_SYNC / MADV_DIRECT to indicate the same > > dynamically via madvise. Similar to O_DIRECT, MAP_DIRECT would be an > > application hint to avoid / minimiize page cache usage, but no strict > > guarantee like what MAP_SYNC provides. > > > Sounds like a great topic to me. Having just gone through a new round of USENIX > paper reviews, it is interesting to see how many academic systems are being > pitched in this space (and most of them don't mention the kernel based xfs/ext4 > with dax). Makes sense, the current fsdax facility is chasing feature deficiencies relative to device-dax (longterm pin support) and nova (dax techniques for fs-metadata).