Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:22:50 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc:     mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, pjt@google.com,
        tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/16] sched: Wrap rq::lock access
Message-ID: <20190219162250.GC32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190218165620.383905466@infradead.org>
 <20190218173514.064516553@infradead.org>
 <20190219161343.GA10816@pauld.bos.csb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190219161343.GA10816@pauld.bos.csb>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:13:43AM -0500, Phil Auld wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 05:56:23PM +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > In preparation of playing games with rq->lock, abstract the thing
> > using an accessor.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Sorry... what tree are these for?  They don't apply to mainline. 
> Some branch on tip, I guess?

tip/master I think; any rejects should be trivial tough.