Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:17:40 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
        Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
        pagupta@redhat.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
        Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, dodgen@google.com,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        dhildenb@redhat.com, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v8 0/7] KVM: Guest Free Page Hinting
Message-ID: <20190219151552-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20190218143819-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <58714908-f203-0b64-845b-5818e52a62fa@redhat.com>
 <20190218152021-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <18d87846-72c7-adf0-5ca3-7312540bb31b@redhat.com>
 <478a9574-a604-0aa9-d569-6a5cd98d7cdc@redhat.com>
 <CAKgT0UfEeDJOYmm5L0Q9QSNrEm=w39_+5Js5CEx=0o2_fhkaGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <77e71dc3-640b-bbf6-6a47-bb2371c06172@redhat.com>
 <CAKgT0UfqSQoBehg7JZ=tzmk7wqSF=h9aMnsk_wpQXqh0NyRCHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190219145241-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <0118482c-e633-3949-6797-94d7deb8a382@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0118482c-e633-3949-6797-94d7deb8a382@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:02:52PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.02.19 20:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:06:35AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >>> I tend to like an asynchronous reporting approach as discussed in this
> >>> thread, we would have to see if Nitesh could get it implemented.
> >>
> >> I agree it would be great if it could work. However I have concerns
> >> given that work on this patch set dates back to 2017, major issues
> >> such as working around device assignment have yet to be addressed,
> > 
> > BTW for device assignment to work, your idea of sending
> > data directly to kvm won't work, will it?
> > You need to update userspace so it can update VFIO right?
> > Another blocker for assignment is ability to make holes
> > an an existing mapping - supported by hardware but
> > not by IOMMU drivers.
> 
> I had the exact same thought and then realized that we decided to block
> the balloon in user space until we figured out how to handle this properly.
> 
> I wonder if MADV_FREE behaves differently compared to MADV_DONTNEED when
> finding pinned pages, but I doubt it. Most probably we'll have to
> disable hinting for device assignments as well.

OK but let's recognize it as a bug not a feature.

-- 
MST