Received: by 2002:ac0:a679:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id p54csp59282imp; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:14:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ia0qC2I7iio+EaAFr7HVSyCPuDjbLXG4Y5cvqPikd4Cqk18SGxVCXbF4ekFDqe8tsBAeJ/2 X-Received: by 2002:a63:54c:: with SMTP id 73mr3367163pgf.295.1550700882167; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:14:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550700882; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SI8JS7N84TWkFaX0e3EKB2CgmgqHM2BVF5/NDKNgQ8VtjyvaH+C/MBold78ArE6oU/ fVp3nZVVmX1AAR2pAI32aJoZkS9ZpbFMLGQpHjv4305teZRD16ubi38HsfCookYk3puI TePDRt8iWYRrukj52VWXVON9ZWwEopzsjpmgepEpVb6sv+Pe7j5eEP5Xq72WyQf7WvNM oH4pMktceW7W9wemh0PJFjBNRq+Wg83Ok7AkxqDNl96D+5AEpmbWp/pghdsaHqJMUSw8 1j2HLxNTDtPa9wv/d0YR29wC1bsxAnxfXLpSp4Gm6mBYryPo/Ia/I6YgcJGkEoT9YSws Xcww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=CVjBnSUI6LhspCqy+73O1/b+atYXeJzMReN5ofxv4gU=; b=UJ7AIvTkC1OKK2HJabPVc2BwFOo9XA+dgex5F7ME6ee1xA3JVXch4go9sw8JgSr9MX 83FQa5QHX530vwKX2vYx1YzBIerFT913Fi7MqeGhBjf3rMTl+VDzafyfZdRT2npj/+oa LpiLAIk0LMeyWOVXsS4MhrlQ6JVsFnFgvlue4j7gz6yt3pZphFyv4P/XS5u91JHdnRui vzlvOYqEWHK5RWdB/2wBVRleBblB2i8heD1fDlKqm2ODc82TM5/1+JVjCNIvUooT0Iwb F6gP1u9JhWF5VU4yQhyucOhfi/sIeglxL7IG47nFJpi02DoQ/b0frStXzcPKuMGcvF1v M+lw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=uZRKdTAp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d34si16378339pld.290.2019.02.20.14.14.27; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:14:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=uZRKdTAp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726535AbfBTWOG (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:14:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:44420 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726126AbfBTWOG (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:14:06 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id g1so42873481otj.11 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:14:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CVjBnSUI6LhspCqy+73O1/b+atYXeJzMReN5ofxv4gU=; b=uZRKdTApkbIvtfeHSNDjyAhSJ4BWOMaxzfeM4Z1KuDX5H9f8P/nNvwKiE+kRHCpWQo Pzzb8KHWZ2VnG/ITfw2dP7KQ7RX5uNV+ZJpXTaDp4yfG3VLORJdVv4AJNzl39NWjy20V bYPkPod9XP5K2AluOq25assvrlESWBmEs+10hqobdZX0Rr0IKEuEZ2TpY+L2qVVDGrtW jLuR5/oylrEgiR/2eMJ9MbgqLWjg6QyWBEpUazDYmiC4jkdLmyjnsKnj6aCCN5Rkd1b/ nOCO5ydPM6xlBo0b9rxwC3a+4g2Ut+35mDt3GLBSRGZ2t06FAGm9awZyVSVvFwWAAejA DIwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CVjBnSUI6LhspCqy+73O1/b+atYXeJzMReN5ofxv4gU=; b=JedRXGy6WbffTmBSVc6vPQrmJACSL0nbZBQJ9kgYHbkfXROSj+PYWQjRRZlKt5ysdP TEdG5zWDRJjz6F5BB5xC/HqjuTHrc8hHEBYd02QMXm5/NeWlZzM9XghAdDLJNjbXgyzl 53RVF3fFhN26QMuIe4bQs2SP4uNsM6W+7Nyl7NebpK/O3C5kA0qdX0SBTlNpKYiRW23c k9KM9ZwPIrvBALShgM8Iv5svjnj2FM/Y32zEXNkMj0apQLoE6RUKcWk30xJhdoEi/Y1d 4Eqvwius3Jox6k1h6mN1FCg229eQTPpecKoA++VxRIxqopY48Tpvh5ZB7/b+g9NdU6mo yQ+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZvGHKzY59jRx7R5s3aYt1F9wxSWzLAmhH1d9m8aoBVf+g/HTvk qcw8bh07QN/rvnTHBJvtlx+ADlqaLA7C8qOPvF7vpA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:37b7:: with SMTP id x52mr24320675otb.214.1550700845305; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:14:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190214171017.9362-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <20190214171017.9362-8-keith.busch@intel.com> <9ab5d6ba-4cb6-a6f1-894d-d79b77c8bc21@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab5d6ba-4cb6-a6f1-894d-d79b77c8bc21@intel.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 07/10] acpi/hmat: Register processor domain to its memory To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Keith Busch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Memory Management List , Linux API , Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:11 PM Dave Hansen wrote: > > On 2/20/19 2:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig > >> index c9637e2e7514..08e972ead159 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig > >> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > >> config ACPI_HMAT > >> bool "ACPI Heterogeneous Memory Attribute Table Support" > >> depends on ACPI_NUMA > >> + select HMEM_REPORTING > > If you want to do this here, I'm not sure that defining HMEM_REPORTING > > as a user-selectable option is a good idea. In particular, I don't > > really think that setting ACPI_HMAT without it makes a lot of sense. > > Apart from this, the patch looks reasonable to me. > > I guess the question is whether we would want to allow folks to consume > the HMAT inside the kernel while not reporting it out via > HMEM_REPORTING. We have some in-kernel users of the HMAT lined up like > mitigations for memory-side caches. > > It's certainly possible that folks would want to consume those > mitigations without anything in sysfs. They might not even want or need > NUMA support itself, for instance. > > So, what should we do? > > config HMEM_REPORTING > bool # no user-visible prompt > default y if ACPI_HMAT > > So folks can override in their .config, but they don't see a prompt? I would add an "&& ACPI_NUMA" to that default as well.