Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
In-Reply-To: <20190213070133.11259-2-hch@lst.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
From:   Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
Subject: Re: [01/32] net: pasemi: set a 64-bit DMA mask on the DMA device
Message-Id: <445RND0KxYz9sNT@ozlabs.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:47:56 +1100 (AEDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 07:01:02 UTC, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The pasemi driver never set a DMA mask, and given that the powerpc
> DMA mapping routines never check it this worked ok so far.  But the
> generic dma-direct code which I plan to switch on for powerpc checks
> the DMA mask and fails unsupported mapping requests, so we need to
> make sure the proper 64-bit mask is set.
> 
> Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>

Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/74ebe3e733b791f37415b3a1b917ee50

cheers