Received: by 2002:ac0:b08d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id l13csp1867859imc; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:46:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaySFllFztU9h7HRj/3NXb95nkUFEKPifszHQhZ3zYeJ6t2sOyRZmY5747UhAO/jWP7C4d6 X-Received: by 2002:a62:59d0:: with SMTP id k77mr6035553pfj.211.1550868377403; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:46:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1550868377; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bDjs+4alvG1Q1Hy81ib9dTWH/11dzz5doQLUwqE4rPSPkPLkAoFe+FuZVdWuPG7UNQ uf+36kP0ty+tpQsznFFCYE7WXUA6VrxibYrzuADwdBeVtwUFuOhL9aqrktgy3dRmC2YS sMpsBCTswiFZKD3e5Fg0rkCOcKp+6OppvC8Gmzrl1brKfLH6ywBLQYIv+IGso5mQdx2i pTKaeWVfK20HI5vOLHK6LJWBbi9U59VR7gz5LKnchazuRQ7kuUUlcooS2gbcon9qcKlm 2lbW9K47LXjuCq5ut1MFo2IzK2//v3zdPmHsmdeAngSDjpcKD5LH/CBWAyPcjpvy2KCZ 01mA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=eL7rKNkTJnphRQGA4sMTzhe3ipFO2A8d6SrwB/Nb65M=; b=XMvg5ZjE39KJivCRzcAS8k5wKjPypyDUjYq4BUn/mznrqOc4Uh2WqbuE9EKXYSe0nq WlpTv+xs8E8FDlzix3Oqi5kCod0wv/kO/ijEPN2bOc59UiRw1CYgelwhvB4LROmxwDLu dvKu4eSr8Xk0pf5UTKS3CO5EnGuk8O+NLIEAFpOInDA1ggbDZyJWHgQtJE/KD6D+RjEa 1OBYnWMK2g7P0O/Ywse0UAU0/2GcCtNHcJU5OyfyOSI6TaPoxkAe9Y9ZB1FhSkL8uPGZ Abi1Wj+EewL1MMjFM2ifMHdj1HAM7D1NOhi/vbMHUizarOE8+ciXsgF2RsBdxYZxr6eY k2XQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6si2234910plf.16.2019.02.22.12.46.01; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:46:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726574AbfBVUpk (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:45:40 -0500 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:55677 "EHLO relay8-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbfBVUpk (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:45:40 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.201.231.99 Received: from bootlin.com (lfbn-tou-1-149-99.w86-201.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.201.231.99]) (Authenticated sender: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1B2B1BF208; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:45:32 +0100 From: Maxime Chevallier To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Antoine Tenart , thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, nadavh@marvell.com, stefanc@marvell.com, mw@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: marvell10g: Use get_features to get the PHY abilities Message-ID: <20190222214532.2a2cc880@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190221095128.28188-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20190221095128.28188-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:42:29 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote: >After my just submitted patch to include the aneg capability checking in >genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities() function mv3310_get_features() isn't >needed any longer and can be replaced with the generic one. I'll still need it to handle the 2.5G/5G abilities that aren't correctly reported on 3310. I'll be able to use the generic function for the 2110 though, which is nice. >But we can make this change afterwards, then you don't have to >rework your series. > >Also I'm not sure whether there will be a 5.0-rc8 or whether beginning >of next week we'll see 5.0. In the latter case we're a little bit in a >hurry because the merge window will start very soon. OK, I'll re-spin the series quickly with the small cleanup needed if everything's OK to you regarding the rest of it. Thanks, Maxime