Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190224141952.GA3653@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559>
 <b96f9ac8-639c-adfa-e0a4-5ff537bc9db4@kernel.dk> <20190224153712.GA11981@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559>
In-Reply-To: <20190224153712.GA11981@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559>
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:50:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvy1fKXEwZJwhD=aCbQ67HO+eK8T27KEfMrLu13ABvO1Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] badblocks: Prefer unsigned int over unsigned
To:     Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:38 PM Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand. I am starting out kernel hacking. I have been working on
> fixing checkpatch.pl warnings. If you have any tasks for me in the
> kernel, it would be great.
>
> I have also noticed a lot of warnings to replace printk with subsystem
> specific warning functions. Is that a valuable change?

This is a very good start:
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2017-April/017765.html

Happy hacking and welcome! :-)

-- 
Thanks,
//richard