Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Cc:     "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        "moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" <bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
        "andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "vivien.didelot@gmail.com" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
References: <20190222235927.10295-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20190222235927.10295-8-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20190223103207.GA13070@splinter>
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=f.fainelli@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 mQGiBEjPuBIRBACW9MxSJU9fvEOCTnRNqG/13rAGsj+vJqontvoDSNxRgmafP8d3nesnqPyR
 xGlkaOSDuu09rxuW+69Y2f1TzjFuGpBk4ysWOR85O2Nx8AJ6fYGCoeTbovrNlGT1M9obSFGQ
 X3IzRnWoqlfudjTO5TKoqkbOgpYqIo5n1QbEjCCwCwCg3DOH/4ug2AUUlcIT9/l3pGvoRJ0E
 AICDzi3l7pmC5IWn2n1mvP5247urtHFs/uusE827DDj3K8Upn2vYiOFMBhGsxAk6YKV6IP0d
 ZdWX6fqkJJlu9cSDvWtO1hXeHIfQIE/xcqvlRH783KrihLcsmnBqOiS6rJDO2x1eAgC8meAX
 SAgsrBhcgGl2Rl5gh/jkeA5ykwbxA/9u1eEuL70Qzt5APJmqVXR+kWvrqdBVPoUNy/tQ8mYc
 nzJJ63ng3tHhnwHXZOu8hL4nqwlYHRa9eeglXYhBqja4ZvIvCEqSmEukfivk+DlIgVoOAJbh
 qIWgvr3SIEuR6ayY3f5j0f2ejUMYlYYnKdiHXFlF9uXm1ELrb0YX4GMHz7QnRmxvcmlhbiBG
 YWluZWxsaSA8Zi5mYWluZWxsaUBnbWFpbC5jb20+iGYEExECACYCGyMGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAME
 FgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCVF/S8QUJHlwd3wAKCRBhV5kVtWN2DvCVAJ4u4/bPF4P3jxb4qEY8I2gS
 6hG0gACffNWlqJ2T4wSSn+3o7CCZNd7SLSC5BA0ESM+4EhAQAL/o09boR9D3Vk1Tt7+gpYr3
 WQ6hgYVON905q2ndEoA2J0dQxJNRw3snabHDDzQBAcqOvdi7YidfBVdKi0wxHhSuRBfuOppu
 pdXkb7zxuPQuSveCLqqZWRQ+Cc2QgF7SBqgznbe6Ngout5qXY5Dcagk9LqFNGhJQzUGHAsIs
 hap1f0B1PoUyUNeEInV98D8Xd/edM3mhO9nRpUXRK9Bvt4iEZUXGuVtZLT52nK6Wv2EZ1TiT
 OiqZlf1P+vxYLBx9eKmabPdm3yjalhY8yr1S1vL0gSA/C6W1o/TowdieF1rWN/MYHlkpyj9c
 Rpc281gAO0AP3V1G00YzBEdYyi0gaJbCEQnq8Vz1vDXFxHzyhgGz7umBsVKmYwZgA8DrrB0M
 oaP35wuGR3RJcaG30AnJpEDkBYHznI2apxdcuTPOHZyEilIRrBGzDwGtAhldzlBoBwE3Z3MY
 31TOpACu1ZpNOMysZ6xiE35pWkwc0KYm4hJA5GFfmWSN6DniimW3pmdDIiw4Ifcx8b3mFrRO
 BbDIW13E51j9RjbO/nAaK9ndZ5LRO1B/8Fwat7bLzmsCiEXOJY7NNpIEpkoNoEUfCcZwmLrU
 +eOTPzaF6drw6ayewEi5yzPg3TAT6FV3oBsNg3xlwU0gPK3v6gYPX5w9+ovPZ1/qqNfOrbsE
 FRuiSVsZQ5s3AAMFD/9XjlnnVDh9GX/r/6hjmr4U9tEsM+VQXaVXqZuHKaSmojOLUCP/YVQo
 7IiYaNssCS4FCPe4yrL4FJJfJAsbeyDykMN7wAnBcOkbZ9BPJPNCbqU6dowLOiy8AuTYQ48m
 vIyQ4Ijnb6GTrtxIUDQeOBNuQC/gyyx3nbL/lVlHbxr4tb6YkhkO6shjXhQh7nQb33FjGO4P
 WU11Nr9i/qoV8QCo12MQEo244RRA6VMud06y/E449rWZFSTwGqb0FS0seTcYNvxt8PB2izX+
 HZA8SL54j479ubxhfuoTu5nXdtFYFj5Lj5x34LKPx7MpgAmj0H7SDhpFWF2FzcC1bjiW9mjW
 HaKaX23Awt97AqQZXegbfkJwX2Y53ufq8Np3e1542lh3/mpiGSilCsaTahEGrHK+lIusl6mz
 Joil+u3k01ofvJMK0ZdzGUZ/aPMZ16LofjFA+MNxWrZFrkYmiGdv+LG45zSlZyIvzSiG2lKy
 kuVag+IijCIom78P9jRtB1q1Q5lwZp2TLAJlz92DmFwBg1hyFzwDADjZ2nrDxKUiybXIgZp9
 aU2d++ptEGCVJOfEW4qpWCCLPbOT7XBr+g/4H3qWbs3j/cDDq7LuVYIe+wchy/iXEJaQVeTC
 y5arMQorqTFWlEOgRA8OP47L9knl9i4xuR0euV6DChDrguup2aJVU4hPBBgRAgAPAhsMBQJU
 X9LxBQkeXB3fAAoJEGFXmRW1Y3YOj4UAn3nrFLPZekMeqX5aD/aq/dsbXSfyAKC45Go0YyxV
 HGuUuzv+GKZ6nsysJ7kCDQRXG8fwARAA6q/pqBi5PjHcOAUgk2/2LR5LjjesK50bCaD4JuNc
 YDhFR7Vs108diBtsho3w8WRd9viOqDrhLJTroVckkk74OY8r+3t1E0Dd4wHWHQZsAeUvOwDM
 PQMqTUBFuMi6ydzTZpFA2wBR9x6ofl8Ax+zaGBcFrRlQnhsuXLnM1uuvS39+pmzIjasZBP2H
 UPk5ifigXcpelKmj6iskP3c8QN6x6GjUSmYx+xUfs/GNVSU1XOZn61wgPDbgINJd/THGdqiO
 iJxCLuTMqlSsmh1+E1dSdfYkCb93R/0ZHvMKWlAx7MnaFgBfsG8FqNtZu3PCLfizyVYYjXbV
 WO1A23riZKqwrSJAATo5iTS65BuYxrFsFNPrf7TitM8E76BEBZk0OZBvZxMuOs6Z1qI8YKVK
 UrHVGFq3NbuPWCdRul9SX3VfOunr9Gv0GABnJ0ET+K7nspax0xqq7zgnM71QEaiaH17IFYGS
 sG34V7Wo3vyQzsk7qLf9Ajno0DhJ+VX43g8+AjxOMNVrGCt9RNXSBVpyv2AMTlWCdJ5KI6V4
 KEzWM4HJm7QlNKE6RPoBxJVbSQLPd9St3h7mxLcne4l7NK9eNgNnneT7QZL8fL//s9K8Ns1W
 t60uQNYvbhKDG7+/yLcmJgjF74XkGvxCmTA1rW2bsUriM533nG9gAOUFQjURkwI8jvMAEQEA
 AYkCaAQYEQIACQUCVxvH8AIbAgIpCRBhV5kVtWN2DsFdIAQZAQIABgUCVxvH8AAKCRCH0Jac
 RAcHBIkHD/9nmfog7X2ZXMzL9ktT++7x+W/QBrSTCTmq8PK+69+INN1ZDOrY8uz6htfTLV9+
 e2W6G8/7zIvODuHk7r+yQ585XbplgP0V5Xc8iBHdBgXbqnY5zBrcH+Q/oQ2STalEvaGHqNoD
 UGyLQ/fiKoLZTPMur57Fy1c9rTuKiSdMgnT0FPfWVDfpR2Ds0gpqWePlRuRGOoCln5GnREA/
 2MW2rWf+CO9kbIR+66j8b4RUJqIK3dWn9xbENh/aqxfonGTCZQ2zC4sLd25DQA4w1itPo+f5
 V/SQxuhnlQkTOCdJ7b/mby/pNRz1lsLkjnXueLILj7gNjwTabZXYtL16z24qkDTI1x3g98R/
 xunb3/fQwR8FY5/zRvXJq5us/nLvIvOmVwZFkwXc+AF+LSIajqQz9XbXeIP/BDjlBNXRZNdo
 dVuSU51ENcMcilPr2EUnqEAqeczsCGpnvRCLfVQeSZr2L9N4svNhhfPOEscYhhpHTh0VPyxI
 pPBNKq+byuYPMyk3nj814NKhImK0O4gTyCK9b+gZAVvQcYAXvSouCnTZeJRrNHJFTgTgu6E0
 caxTGgc5zzQHeX67eMzrGomG3ZnIxmd1sAbgvJUDaD2GrYlulfwGWwWyTNbWRvMighVdPkSF
 6XFgQaosWxkV0OELLy2N485YrTr2Uq64VKyxpncLh50e2RnyAJ9qfUATKC9NgZjRvBztfqy4
 a9BQwACgnzGuH1BVeT2J0Ra+ZYgkx7DaPR0=
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: switchdev: Replace port attr set SDO
 with a notification
Message-ID: <daaa3bb6-78b1-7c19-e2fd-6ec03d56201d@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 08:47:27 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190223103207.GA13070@splinter>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Le 2/23/19 à 2:32 AM, Ido Schimmel a écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Drop switchdev_ops.switchdev_port_attr_set. Drop the uses of this field
>> from all clients, which were migrated to use switchdev notification in
>> the previous patches.
>>
>> Add a new function switchdev_port_attr_notify() that sends the switchdev
>> notifications SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET and takes care, depending on
>> SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER to call the blocking (process) or non-blocking
>> (atomic) notifier chain accordingly.
>>
>> Drop __switchdev_port_attr_set() and update switchdev_port_attr_set()
>> likewise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 96 +++++++++++----------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> index 94400f5b8e07..a1f16836ef89 100644
>> --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
>> @@ -174,81 +174,35 @@ static int switchdev_deferred_enqueue(struct net_device *dev,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/**
>> - *	switchdev_port_attr_get - Get port attribute
> 
> Hmm, why do you remove it here? Can't you remove it in a separate patch?
> I thought we already got rid of it :p

Yes it should have been removed, looks like my previous series did not
that, I will send that separately.

> 
>> - *
>> - *	@dev: port device
>> - *	@attr: attribute to get
>> - */
>> -int switchdev_port_attr_get(struct net_device *dev, struct switchdev_attr *attr)
>> +static int switchdev_port_attr_notify(enum switchdev_notifier_type nt,
>> +				      struct net_device *dev,
>> +				      const struct switchdev_attr *attr,
>> +				      struct switchdev_trans *trans)
>>  {
>> -	const struct switchdev_ops *ops = dev->switchdev_ops;
>> -	struct net_device *lower_dev;
>> -	struct list_head *iter;
>> -	struct switchdev_attr first = {
>> -		.id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_UNDEFINED
>> -	};
>> -	int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	int err;
>> +	int rc;
>>  
>> -	if (ops && ops->switchdev_port_attr_get)
>> -		return ops->switchdev_port_attr_get(dev, attr);
>> +	struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info attr_info = {
>> +		.attr = attr,
>> +		.trans = trans,
>> +		.handled = false,
>> +	};
>>  
>> -	if (attr->flags & SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE)
>> +	if (attr & SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER)
>> +		rc = call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers(nt, dev,
>> +						       &attr_info.info, NULL);
>> +	else
>> +		rc = call_switchdev_notifiers(nt, dev, &attr_info.info, NULL);
> 
> I don't believe this is needed. You're calling this function from
> switchdev_port_attr_set_now() which is always called from process
> context. switchdev_port_attr_set() takes care of that. Similar to
> switchdev_port_obj_add().

Except for net/bridge/br_switchdev.c when we check the bridge port's
flags support with PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS. In that case we are executing from
the caller (atomic) context and we can't defer otherwise that trumps the
whole idea of being able to do a quick check and return that to the
caller that we cannot support specific flags. How would you recommend
approaching that?
-- 
Florian