Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262844AbUCPEac (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:30:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262850AbUCPEac (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:30:32 -0500 Received: from svr44.ehostpros.com ([66.98.192.92]:13186 "EHLO svr44.ehostpros.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262844AbUCPEaZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:30:25 -0500 From: "Amit S. Kale" Organization: EmSysSoft To: George Anzinger Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH][2/3] Update CVS KGDB's have kgdb_{schedule,process}_breakpoint Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:00:01 +0530 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Tom Rini , kernel list , Pavel Machek , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20040225213626.GF1052@smtp.west.cox.net> <200403151650.34115.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> <40560962.9050804@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <40560962.9050804@mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403161000.02223.amitkale@emsyssoft.com> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr44.ehostpros.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - emsyssoft.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1650 Lines: 46 On Tuesday 16 Mar 2004 1:22 am, George Anzinger wrote: > Amit S. Kale wrote: > > On Friday 12 Mar 2004 1:33 pm, George Anzinger wrote: > >>Amit S. Kale wrote: > >>>On Friday 12 Mar 2004 2:58 am, George Anzinger wrote: > >>>>Amit S. Kale wrote: > >>>>~ > >>>> > >>>>>>context any > >>>>>> > >>>>>>p fun() > >>>>> > >>>>>p fun() will push arguments on stack over the place where irq occured, > >>>>>which is exactly how it'll run. > >>>> > >>>>Is this capability in kgdb lite? It was one of the last things I added > >>>>to -mm version. > >>> > >>>No! It's not present in kgdb heavy also. All you can do is set $pc, > >>>continue. > >> > >>Possibly I can help here. I did it for the mm version. It does require > >> a couple of asm bits and it sort of messes up the set/fetch memory, but > >> it does do the job. > > > > I have seen that. It's too messy! > > You have a better solution? Nope. I think this feature is very likely to be abused by programmers. They do deserve suffering if they choose to shoot at their own feet. Kernel programmers have to be aware of implementation of this feature if they choose to call arbitrary functions. This includes knowing whether interrupts are disabled, handling of exceptions in gdb called functions, whether other processors run, that breakpoints are disabled. Given that kgdb is used for learning the kernel, such features are best kept aside. -Amit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/