Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:55:21 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] objtool: STAC/CLAC validation
Message-ID: <20190225115521.GC32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <9e037d68-75e7-1beb-0c9c-33a7ffeced1b@zytor.com>
 <20190219090409.GW32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20190219124808.GG8501@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
 <f8e99706-4e3b-68ec-7a3e-6e6dd876ad2f@zytor.com>
 <cb221e71-243d-fdbd-1d18-b175bc88979b@arm.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902212231490.1612@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAHk-=wh1B9eRG=gj7wsFVC5XNEedk8Edive-2cQok6T2dNq2aQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902221853330.1666@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20190222222635.GK14054@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <99aab8c6-0000-b06b-71c0-bd36e0d39768@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <99aab8c6-0000-b06b-71c0-bd36e0d39768@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 08:33:35AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > It has an AC_SAFE(func) annotation which allows marking specific
> > functions as safe to call. The patch includes 2 instances which were
> > required to make arch/x86 'build':

> I haven't looked at all the details. But could the annotation be called
> UACCESS_SAFE() (and corresponding naming in the objtool checks)? Since
> this is not an x86 only issue and the AC flags only exists for x86.

Sure that works. Lemme sed the patches.