Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] mm/resource: return real error codes from walk failures
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, bhelgaas@google.com,
        mpe@ellerman.id.au, dan.j.williams@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
        zwisler@kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
        thomas.lendacky@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        mhocko@suse.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        ying.huang@intel.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, bp@suse.de,
        baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com, tiwai@suse.de, jglisse@redhat.com,
        benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, keith.busch@intel.com
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:57:30 -0800
References: <20190225185727.BCBD768C@viggo.jf.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190225185727.BCBD768C@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20190225185730.D8AA7812@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

walk_system_ram_range() can return an error code either becuase
*it* failed, or because the 'func' that it calls returned an
error.  The memory hotplug does the following:

	ret = walk_system_ram_range(..., func);
        if (ret)
		return ret;

and 'ret' makes it out to userspace, eventually.  The problem
s, walk_system_ram_range() failues that result from *it* failing
(as opposed to 'func') return -1.  That leads to a very odd
-EPERM (-1) return code out to userspace.

Make walk_system_ram_range() return -EINVAL for internal
failures to keep userspace less confused.

This return code is compatible with all the callers that I
audited.

This changes both the generic mm/ and powerpc-specific
implementations to have the same return value.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@kernel.org>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
---

 b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c |    2 +-
 b/kernel/resource.c     |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c~memory-hotplug-walk_system_ram_range-returns-neg-1 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c~memory-hotplug-walk_system_ram_range-returns-neg-1	2019-02-25 10:56:47.452908034 -0800
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c	2019-02-25 10:56:47.458908034 -0800
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long star
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
 	unsigned long tstart, tend;
-	int ret = -1;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
 		tstart = max(start_pfn, memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg));
diff -puN kernel/resource.c~memory-hotplug-walk_system_ram_range-returns-neg-1 kernel/resource.c
--- a/kernel/resource.c~memory-hotplug-walk_system_ram_range-returns-neg-1	2019-02-25 10:56:47.454908034 -0800
+++ b/kernel/resource.c	2019-02-25 10:56:47.459908034 -0800
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resourc
 				 int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
 {
 	struct resource res;
-	int ret = -1;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	while (start < end &&
 	       !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, first_lvl, &res)) {
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct resource res;
 	unsigned long pfn, end_pfn;
-	int ret = -1;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	start = (u64) start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
_