Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:15:24 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net>,
       Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Suspend development list <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: The verdict on the future of suspending to disk?
Message-ID: <20040316121524.GI2175@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <1079408330.3403.5.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au> <20040316113717.GB2282@elf.ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040316113717.GB2282@elf.ucw.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 919
Lines: 22

Hi!

> > - Apply patches making swsusp into suspend2, leaving out freezer changes
> > until people are convinced the current solution is insufficient.
> 
> Could you prepare some "swsusp2 without freezer" patch, so that we can
> see how it looks like? 

Or.. if you prefer. Would it be possible to get "two stage
refrigerator but without intrusive changes"? That should still be
better than what is there just now, and it should be mostly
independend change (right?). It will not give us suspend when nfs
server dies, but at least it will not have problems with mysqld...

								Pavel-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/