Received: by 2002:ac0:b08d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id l13csp4923573imc; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:44:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IboyUZ9aXEkO7AhbqGmo/48V2SFpcL029xtrIBz7lPWdDDfWRKV3NCReGepHqTyN6gWrgj+ X-Received: by 2002:a62:465d:: with SMTP id t90mr23042183pfa.181.1551131052805; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:44:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551131052; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wOn4Em9T6SMemvMIyZ7Y1jYDXsn/vjZki2Bu37hzkJgXE8anfhygaHNefAcnrv+WJY sfyoU2NN7bu6DgVkUv1iNQ/UWlNzRQ8dQe7K+HysX+xEC4kzzxm5HsxmW50lZCD+DDxX IF693Uj9TPZRNPsVS33/RZ5e6fxZu8CJE529Qpin2XdgMDTqYrLJeYKnCTO1Uh1BG6H8 sAwQWc0/t69CAF2fC9UebUkJqBHqooOsHIjL3wffIorEk7Lv5IRF20v2wz4Pma88L+tE dHfpdxocGRZKYJenO5wWd17m39JkJsjIpxKQSOHpeuTzxS9D3UA7KpNYiCEpSrWLiOkE HBIQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=pH6xWjYmhamDb8GJtacnhhdXGkwKcRMtfHhvttUId5E=; b=ErlsZ8sbjpLH8XegqouRT1eVLGYsBOEl/naaqvcA6jQ7GMHm3ail6Qw7+GDQJ3dMJ7 6eqDe4SmSh/GcBadLEWMzGD8OESnlvt5Y2rkTmHqKQ8CHymoBurjb4jCqeUtoY5l83Mh pWmoU2DutKWGZb7we3gqGOUQjP2LUlbraEu/pF4d/VjKANRV07qTj0IZe/Gbwg+j4IcU AGDl756ns09bykBPQevNpUb+NidqInLK44b3UlwXbymEYS83j1LHC04bydw79E/5JLGi FuFDctXl7BI+N++1YiF34W6N4n1fZ1pFKbz9qLT3zAuZtlcVxn5SV5gAFdJCLMVHIp/p 8Syw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="M/ZcSlPb"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j70si9598819pgd.65.2019.02.25.13.43.58; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="M/ZcSlPb"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732411AbfBYVdQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:33:16 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39490 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728907AbfBYVdP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:33:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDF64217F5; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:33:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551130394; bh=sBErCJTa8jm6WC72b4Jzz0kOQVnGNm0VyJMYQJAS57k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M/ZcSlPbbwezaC5vhdx7pv/ybqccehtREzlMy7g5KokQ+lcWGOaVtontUwkb60hfc W28KDP7IhcsxqRkoZsAnHfIsIbBY1WVNkqsurKNIqFu7Ggi70E4JL2lyK4S2kTnvm9 nZANwRE4P/Uls3zWNLemg2HrmwNdHZDATL/ThzAg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , Stanislav Fomichev , Daniel Borkmann , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.20 108/183] selftests/bpf: retry tests that expect build-id Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:11:21 +0100 Message-Id: <20190225195112.895012140@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190225195054.748060397@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190225195054.748060397@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit f67ad87ab3120e82845521b18a2b99273a340308 ] While running test_progs in a loop I found out that I'm sometimes hitting "Didn't find expected build ID from the map" error. Looking at stack_map_get_build_id_offset() it seems that it is racy (by design) and can sometimes return BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP (i.e. can't trylock current->mm->mmap_sem). Let's retry this test a single time. Fixes: 13790d1cc72c ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with build_id in NMI context") Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c index 6ac7232b0fdeb..3ec4ce156074c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c @@ -1136,7 +1136,9 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id(void) int i, j; struct bpf_stack_build_id id_offs[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; int build_id_matches = 0; + int retry = 1; +retry: err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, &obj, &prog_fd); if (CHECK(err, "prog_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno)) goto out; @@ -1249,6 +1251,19 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id(void) previous_key = key; } while (bpf_map_get_next_key(stackmap_fd, &previous_key, &key) == 0); + /* stack_map_get_build_id_offset() is racy and sometimes can return + * BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP instead of BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID; + * try it one more time. + */ + if (build_id_matches < 1 && retry--) { + ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + close(pmu_fd); + bpf_object__close(obj); + printf("%s:WARN:Didn't find expected build ID from the map, retrying\n", + __func__); + goto retry; + } + if (CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match", "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n")) goto disable_pmu; @@ -1289,7 +1304,9 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi(void) int i, j; struct bpf_stack_build_id id_offs[PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH]; int build_id_matches = 0; + int retry = 1; +retry: err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, &obj, &prog_fd); if (CHECK(err, "prog_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno)) return; @@ -1384,6 +1401,19 @@ static void test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi(void) previous_key = key; } while (bpf_map_get_next_key(stackmap_fd, &previous_key, &key) == 0); + /* stack_map_get_build_id_offset() is racy and sometimes can return + * BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP instead of BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID; + * try it one more time. + */ + if (build_id_matches < 1 && retry--) { + ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + close(pmu_fd); + bpf_object__close(obj); + printf("%s:WARN:Didn't find expected build ID from the map, retrying\n", + __func__); + goto retry; + } + if (CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match", "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n")) goto disable_pmu; -- 2.19.1