Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:28:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:28:13 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:20485 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:27:51 -0400 Subject: Re: /proc/config idea To: dlang@diginsite.com (David Lang) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:27:26 +0100 (BST) Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), jerj@coplanar.net (Jeremy Jackson), ian@cs.umbc.edu (Ian Soboroff), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "David Lang" at Apr 02, 2001 07:52:49 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > a module for 2.4.3 will work for any 2.4.3 kernel that supports modules > at all (except for the SMP vs UP issue) so it's not the same thing as > trying to figure out which if the 2.4.3 kernels matches what you are > running. Nope. The 2.4 kernel ABI depends upon a mixture of config options including the cpu type, as well as the compiler version being used. The API is intended to be constant throughout 2.4 (but isnt yet totally solid due to bug fixing activity). We don't care about the ABI because we are source code based - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/