Received: by 2002:ac0:8845:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g63csp116179img; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:03:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ibwr55ckcU9eqUHuj5FAJP6HFy/l5QaL3Ed2YuPB5TlrdhGhMZQbndM2c2pSIKeK73DViNa X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:31c3:: with SMTP id x61mr23460212plb.113.1551150183499; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:03:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551150183; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sFlO4OexEBezgsx2DOdlq4TJ/Tu4fHbpq+tjK9IgL/lh4tyh8/0n6I9Erga/1Ahmb1 k50AIQ//PbTSWHemUFfv/9J6oaWpgg3n+jWSq1DzmJ8Z2DCW0Io0OXh7qPoczkokiJiH 6mh01Au+PmOmzkjIzgU7xNSqLF9ypDOUAR8Xw5gBFCfCp5wjm3J6uitj17wdeAPwbMqb t6M9XxQYqtiIdgFUWhKbJES2SxRmUIXwfyo+X3zIP0H3SEY1kJZ39VVSSzNTa3RzOhmm wPHl0EMwts9eLCPAlmwnbOZRP1sLxxXfvLB3F5HUlrTQpx9lDzKfOiCNH3hnKNgoXFMv 9o6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=n32C7RllPe1fpsKLASFNc1TKdKtKT4gg6zSx10Koi3A=; b=nUllvwgjDGccMM0MIZjkCM5vD6oGmGI9J5IkxITjW8ZBIGyOtFi4vXx/Q/eTPBUXBx zGEq8dOG2yvtnUHvMt4c1mnIMDeEtOOnZTehCMi9J+r2zGaJk873U5soEFV+WniWBmDQ W2zKdItGp3fcDsCxfGi3oNdqbFUqmgp01O7C3F2YMTxb4XyBGOfM0MACTB1DfljcZLbx grkxgAqUwQ3aCE8BkPJIG6gEPhQ36hLd0KOWPSpbvFPtlhFEJyB9p6Whsu3i/MrajpQk B3Vrdz8/rMycpDLN9ML+CeC7RWt+k5Sdd6gsAJ8GD463JcvJHt78P1lB52hD/BtWCbw2 qxsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=AKIKGvdb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l15si11367387pfb.146.2019.02.25.19.02.35; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=AKIKGvdb; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726185AbfBZDCF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:02:05 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59986 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725954AbfBZDCF (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:02:05 -0500 Received: from devnote (NE2965lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [210.141.244.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB67A21841; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 03:02:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551150123; bh=QUGnFHsjQAYPEf/fWHg1f2Aj3+j0RMlKMEM5z0dakWI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AKIKGvdb3r1iPXlVlpcCDVHPlNxSkWYKGQiCcP9s65MXozW1XCbbDyCmo4B9Vu6PQ KYnFJgllpDUcVFsEBtH3x/4Scr1iTExsqoU3x0WOA+Lb2+5huurcEaCblUFoYenolJ gjiwNkOVR5mVWOAJd4MtZ/wL+W3LM8aAxWSt++C4= Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:01:59 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Changbin Du , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Alexei Starovoitov , Nadav Amit Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] uaccess: Add non-pagefault user-space read functions Message-Id: <20190226120159.c346704961ff22d344f45e96@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20190225150603.GE32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <155110348217.21156.3874419272673328527.stgit@devbox> <155110354092.21156.13871336589042178985.stgit@devbox> <20190225150603.GE32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Peter, On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:06:03 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:05:41PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > +static __always_inline long __strncpy_from_unsafe_user(char *dst, > > + const char __user *unsafe_addr, long count) > > +{ > > + if (!access_ok(unsafe_addr, count)) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + > > + return strncpy_from_unsafe_common(dst, unsafe_addr, count); > > +} > > Would something like so work for people? > > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 +++++++- > include/linux/uaccess.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > index 780f2b42c8ef..3125d129d3b6 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@ -92,12 +92,18 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un > * checks that the pointer is in the user space range - after calling > * this function, memory access functions may still return -EFAULT. > */ > -#define access_ok(addr, size) \ > +#define access_ok(addr, size) \ > ({ \ > WARN_ON_IN_IRQ(); \ > likely(!__range_not_ok(addr, size, user_addr_max())); \ > }) > > +#define user_access_ok(addr, size) \ > +({ \ > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)); \ > + likely(!__range_not_ok(addr, size, user_addr_max())); \ > +}) > + > /* > * These are the main single-value transfer routines. They automatically > * use the right size if we just have the right pointer type. > diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h > index 37b226e8df13..088f2ae09e14 100644 > --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h > +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h > @@ -10,6 +10,24 @@ > > #include > > +/** > + * user_access_ok: Checks if a user space pointer is valid > + * @addr: User space pointer to start of block to check > + * @size: Size of block to check > + * > + * Context: User context or explicit set_fs(USER_DS). > + * > + * This function is very much like access_ok(), except it (may) have different > + * context validation. In general we must be very careful when using this. > + */ > +#ifndef user_access_ok > +#define user_access_ok(addr, size) \ > +({ \ > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)); \ > + access_ok(addr, size); \ > +}) > +#endif > + > /* > * Architectures should provide two primitives (raw_copy_{to,from}_user()) > * and get rid of their private instances of copy_{to,from}_user() and Yeah, looks good to me. Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu