Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:51:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:51:12 -0400 Received: from tomts8.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.52]:24266 "EHLO tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:50:57 -0400 Message-ID: <3AC9C577.920036CD@coplanar.net> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 08:43:36 -0400 From: Jeremy Jackson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: David Lang , Jeff Garzik , Ian Soboroff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc/config idea In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > a module for 2.4.3 will work for any 2.4.3 kernel that supports modules > > at all (except for the SMP vs UP issue) so it's not the same thing as > > trying to figure out which if the 2.4.3 kernels matches what you are > > running. > > Nope. The 2.4 kernel ABI depends upon a mixture of config options including the > cpu type, as well as the compiler version being used. The API is intended to > be constant throughout 2.4 (but isnt yet totally solid due to bug fixing > activity). We don't care about the ABI because we are source code based > Is it possible to identify *all* the dependencies and include symbols (or by some other method) have these dependencies checked by insmod? It would be simply smashing to have it all inherently bullet proof. (i know never say never, but lower maintenance then or simpler for users or something) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/