Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190223084816.28985-1-ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> <20190224.220653.256212672271785631.davem@davemloft.net>
 <VI1PR0402MB280056BBF62A86E1703C549BE07A0@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0402MB280056BBF62A86E1703C549BE07A0@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:03:17 -0600
Message-ID: <CADRPPNSRpbD_dUZYJC4-SwudNk2JTPCug3T6g4dTYMBDQeeu7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
To:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>,
        Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>,
        Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
        Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@nxp.com>,
        "brouer@redhat.com" <brouer@redhat.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:01 AM Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
> >
> > From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
> > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:48:42 +0000
> >
> > > The first two patches enable cache stashing and configure the core
> > > cluster destination per software portal while the third patch is the
> > > one configuring the amount of stashing on a queue.
> >
> > Should I merge this series in via my networking tree?
>
> Even though it would be really good to have this on the networking tree as soon as possible, I am afraid that patch 2/3 is not going to apply cleanly because it touches the same areas of code that some other patches on Leo's tree are.

Hi David,

What shall we do if we want to get this in the 5.1?  Since the change
on the ethernet driver is pretty small, can I get your ACK on that
patch and merge the series through my tree?  Otherwise I can also try
to get the dpio patches in next merge window, and you can apply the
Ethernet patch after that.

Regards,
Leo