Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:31:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20190226.123148.2025630912555867905.davem@davemloft.net>
To:     leoyang.li@nxp.com
Cc:     ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, roy.pledge@nxp.com,
        ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com,
        horia.geanta@nxp.com, brouer@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
From:   David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <CADRPPNSRpbD_dUZYJC4-SwudNk2JTPCug3T6g4dTYMBDQeeu7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190224.220653.256212672271785631.davem@davemloft.net>
        <VI1PR0402MB280056BBF62A86E1703C549BE07A0@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
        <CADRPPNSRpbD_dUZYJC4-SwudNk2JTPCug3T6g4dTYMBDQeeu7w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:03:17 -0600

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:01 AM Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
>> >
>> > From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
>> > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:48:42 +0000
>> >
>> > > The first two patches enable cache stashing and configure the core
>> > > cluster destination per software portal while the third patch is the
>> > > one configuring the amount of stashing on a queue.
>> >
>> > Should I merge this series in via my networking tree?
>>
>> Even though it would be really good to have this on the networking tree as soon as possible, I am afraid that patch 2/3 is not going to apply cleanly because it touches the same areas of code that some other patches on Leo's tree are.
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> What shall we do if we want to get this in the 5.1?  Since the change
> on the ethernet driver is pretty small, can I get your ACK on that
> patch and merge the series through my tree?

Sure.

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>