Received: by 2002:ac0:8845:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g63csp1228118img; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:07:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYY3Vrkc+KFo1Mizvb55FwbfZsMT7T30QFe0se40tvPrpWEtOBYbii/BI/VeBQpBntTo1fg X-Received: by 2002:a62:b801:: with SMTP id p1mr15899208pfe.25.1551229621894; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:07:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551229621; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SbTKjg9t7MmG1ySBNjKwum7oXCp9vFJbvFWvvIrENhGniU9AVx/aAEOhvAxqEm2yKz rMHxv+WDTyW9P8wBagzggTTtE5iwquEnf07w53V4ynFqMO3DQZK25rlqB/Pp9ZsYpekq zrUYNE53MNf52/3Eo+8yq5VfxoqH/wqZHm7zhln2Xkujamv+HoRxP4K292WbgFq0BAId 2HR/itbG7ew05utCV1N9gUtIRwznKudWcwfGh8nM8qla9adkmhPmJP7lMjt1RPKvNH3W 4xVHdjAPeSFrUJkB9cNy9hUgpefPmU/FiIua0Zx9KRBqG1AobnhPuhx+nMa7tkWC4fQq st7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=ko7VOjYkTxEk3ajFDcWnP8ZT8qL1w1mPzsQLYQE0gl8=; b=QK0wA+IqHPUMfSBxfN4f2ZykA3OlGcvd9/t3j+wa/n9LlGrit+xbNUF0xEtEwMpH4e TzUqMfmr555bU+jL5Gr/0WvlsTMz8YDIp22S0mX3M9sXK1L9zqSl6CeTVUMLlnXjzORD aRbNkNB5AI/gI0PkCZpk8BZnZPo6B85RwXuT9ZLK15kQDScwRiTC5ep2ScGmzWGPFDQ3 7SK48+Acnb9RG/6/5dJT3MGSRzTNQ+h8MDf81tl+gOHJZmmOW/f83eLYLDVmZ4PYqqtY erEXx2U6m+bAtPzg4jrSK5rOw++AkT3wK/U4uDd85iTOfGjTzqV6SP3630is9yZfGqs/ qo/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10si15292956pfh.8.2019.02.26.17.06.47; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729601AbfB0BGP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:06:15 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55694 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729580AbfB0BGL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 20:06:11 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DBA1AED; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:06:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from beelzebub.austin.arm.com (beelzebub.austin.arm.com [10.118.12.119]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B66793F5C1; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:06:10 -0800 (PST) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, shankerd@codeaurora.org, julien.thierry@arm.com, mlangsdo@redhat.com, stefan.wahren@i2e.com, Andre.Przywara@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Linton Subject: [PATCH v5 09/10] arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for speculative store bypass Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:05:43 -0600 Message-Id: <20190227010544.597579-10-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 In-Reply-To: <20190227010544.597579-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20190227010544.597579-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return status based on ssbd_state and the arm64 SSBS feature. If the mitigation is disabled, or the firmware isn't responding then return the expected machine state based on a new blacklist of known vulnerable cores. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c index 5f5611d17dc1..e1b03f643799 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void) DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u64, arm64_ssbd_callback_required); int ssbd_state __read_mostly = ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL; +static bool __ssb_safe = true; static const struct ssbd_options { const char *str; @@ -387,6 +388,9 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible()); + if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), entry->midr_range_list)) + __ssb_safe = false; + if (this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_SSBS)) { required = false; goto out_printmsg; @@ -420,6 +424,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN; return false; + /* machines with mixed mitigation requirements must not return this */ case SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED: pr_info_once("%s mitigation not required\n", entry->desc); ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED; @@ -475,6 +480,16 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, return required; } +/* known vulnerable cores */ +static const struct midr_range arm64_ssb_cpus[] = { + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A57), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A72), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A73), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A75), + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A76), + {}, +}; + static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused) { @@ -770,6 +785,7 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { .capability = ARM64_SSBD, .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, .matches = has_ssbd_mitigation, + .midr_range_list = arm64_ssb_cpus, }, #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 { @@ -808,3 +824,30 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n"); } + +ssize_t cpu_show_spec_store_bypass(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + /* + * Two assumptions: First, ssbd_state reflects the worse case + * for hetrogenous machines, and that if SSBS is supported its + * supported by all cores. + */ + switch (ssbd_state) { + case ARM64_SSBD_MITIGATED: + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + + case ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL: + case ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE: + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_SSBS)) + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) + return sprintf(buf, + "Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled\n"); + } + + if (__ssb_safe) + return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n"); + + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n"); +} -- 2.20.1