Received: by 2002:ac0:8845:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g63csp1902213img; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:21:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYVGmJJ/519TX5Q35z/FdJ1cKBz2j7yo1fQjGaMNMPPgozj7k1NXpvHiqv+DqlUxMWE1o7a X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:284b:: with SMTP id e69mr2595107plb.11.1551280884438; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:21:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551280884; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PxJTOoOC2dQij7i0v6PYPi/aHJKcQppNueD/R8zY+4bK4O872YvfHVIBPumLsxges4 usqP+3iCbDV9x3bB+T/BN1dUOMH+4uvtw99W3k1BW5l39+Opc9DuVNgEvKd+KsVyule6 Tdd8fLiRfflIlu1rsDJupN/8VrLSZ4O9h+/Zx95k7HCRnc3D1TL8gr79KcT+rqwX39Ar 1CGdQ6vOahpNgZdw2SIzpCjCywZOPw247213/DEe0iVbxMb4Y8AYSB2GMsmMGA2HVeYE tppTYzxkr/5id4mMcCPDPpSlfZ0pbGonHS89sP01Q5DKGjHvUPo45ytCzQXUN3xRCdYc +cPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=z7VHDfKQVnUXmACKd7kxkgUQ5KuMiuRvPKmcR2RZl9Q=; b=s170rp3iYyEa5nrvegKzyG325PachJ5gGd9UjUms4CQOQ74YMVwC64yL7kLgxUhSgb bWEQ5bDEbKz5FZ1t55EJf1AjhVYH+gFCYiZEjEVd2+fot5IYErv50UdPlRFLMJgxqFeh 1FcpRzpvlDJGmkjfpopFv+xPF7dxJC+/MwOz0mVs8c+o2h+CdBbTtpgbiDJ2rcIp//ny 1pHubfirBff+oh9diYf22wn4TAgj3Qr5aLsF5WMd4LTvFPjx1TRHSL1EPQNwEj78pchW eT7b/ISH444ptY05Iz1MqK8MpBBRdLF2Qc8YEVKycVdekI3tBxQuzYQyfxOvXq+P+zyQ P+xQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x206si1204382pgx.193.2019.02.27.07.21.08; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 07:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730698AbfB0Od3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:33:29 -0500 Received: from Mailgw01.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.78]:54175 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730222AbfB0Od3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:33:29 -0500 X-UUID: ce4db0ea793c41548216446ed4da2f96-20190227 X-UUID: ce4db0ea793c41548216446ed4da2f96-20190227 Received: from mtkcas34.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.253)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1687198339; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:33:22 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31N1.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:33:20 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:33:20 +0800 Message-ID: <1551278000.17917.50.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] driver core: Remove the link if there is no driver with AUTO flag From: Yong Wu To: Evan Green CC: Joerg Roedel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , Robin Murphy , Tomasz Figa , Will Deacon , , , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , LKML , , , Arnd Bergmann , , , Nicolas Boichat Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:33:20 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1546318276-18993-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1546318276-18993-3-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 15:53 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 8:52 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER/SUPPLIER means "Remove the link > > automatically on consumer/supplier driver unbind", that means we should > > remove whole the device_link when there is no this driver no matter what > > the ref_count of the link is. > > > > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > > --- > > The ref_count of our device_link normally is over 1. When the consumer > > device driver is removed, whole the device_link should be removed. > > Thus, I add this patch. > > --- > > I will admit to reading about device links for the first time while > reviewing this patch, but I don't really get this. Why use a kref at > all if we're just going to ignore its value? For instance, I see that > if you call device_link_add() with the same supplier and consumer, it > uses the kref to return the same link. That machinery is broken with > your change. Although I don't see any uses of it, you might also > expect a supplier or consumer could do a kref_get() on the link it got > back from device_link_add(), and have a reasonable expectation that > the link wouldn't be freed out from under it. This would also be > broken. > > Can you explain why your device_links normally have a reference count > >1, I use device link between the smi-larb device and the iommu-consumer device. Take a example, smi-larb1 have 4 VDEC ports. From 4/13 in this patchset, we use device_link to link the VDEC device and the smi-larb1 device in the function(mtk_iommu_config). since there are 4 ports, it will call device_link_add 4 times. > > and why those additional references can't be cleaned up in an > orderly fashion? If the iommu-consume device(like VDEC above) is removed, It should enter device_links_driver_cleanup which only ref_put one time. I guess whole the link should be removed at that time. > > (To be honest, I don't really understand the case for the AUTOREMOVE > flags at all. Is there some case where the party that set up the link > can't tear it down? Or is this a way to devm_ify the link, where devm > itself doesn't work because the links themselves stall out that > mechanism?)