Received: by 2002:ac0:8845:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g63csp2050381img; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaY6It9zLvaLTCXOk1lwmEk6cxm+dQuRiV+m/fwCvH/ULqTZuqecVOGYVycWf1cxIooDFC8 X-Received: by 2002:a63:1021:: with SMTP id f33mr4010130pgl.392.1551288923101; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551288923; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uqLHube8rDn7req6rr+NUsFbXb9Q9Eb0xYi/EHeexM/CiJ7yiSmY7Myxcb2i1pLcEP 0yF0dlZ6oEEtJHPSBqTj7+NO12TD5hQZMm60/egtScwVkC7cLpUdNiMlxJi2Hb7iJIcr bua05vxr7P3Cd/0zDcTrZ0P3m0gTig51zXBZ61st8WFwFE+BWHQkv6G5VSN5o6kp9Tba 9X1VzS8K99Mo5h5VxhnTnf5jHI6mkXMG2Q0pAZL8H0DO2t9JVsc1m4t20z1sRK+wC4fu W02r9CCWYYaEr1/veAKbTW9vd2VrIs2ap5nHw1xqeTRIeikPgScTXOmxb0DyiMi0n0f9 y2LQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fH5U7HBCeIOHhM3PEx8G974tsbEs5EFbZGdA5Fo6tPI=; b=w4Yl8R8MoAZoedReltBztUmHrIfa6fAVwPZPApNMOXuFKma/SaFq4g/zoQOtHeuCnF 636ceMbciTdAQtkOLABP3tsdp3nQlOl8dxAU25iheCG8YwIH/Po+5Suizi2OE3JPBlNR i5fPUZFBA627h8x4fr/3hix9IyO3++oNBCKDu48jUBoHVcZGc33Hwp5E68545OmNjBuS gNhrHC0+JBgEYM1reeNBypGY9EdAzFkyjLlQ7JMok7GbElc59juvjzez60aPfhqXMUXP lDoujRKRB9vU4CJ4TuR9yexWoJbun4vKHqpkZnytYG3xL7Tme3AV03CwVuuKPJnqSZ97 cISw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=F+F7mpm7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g8si15008376pgb.128.2019.02.27.09.35.09; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=merlin.20170209 header.b=F+F7mpm7; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729558AbfB0Re2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:34:28 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:37040 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727636AbfB0Re2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:34:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fH5U7HBCeIOHhM3PEx8G974tsbEs5EFbZGdA5Fo6tPI=; b=F+F7mpm7XuCNCW52RZ9F+nyNQ TuSxySPwS5sWNVsob1qmE8A5fbOSyRDIA1vt+SeMUp6D4oELCW6Ot6tbkkU68P8bGd9cV2SkbUQ1U W6hUJB6rtGo6ccwsNU9jwwWXTpPusar23kD6rGXz+gvWv4Jkd3/uM97GAwNaJRJfPjKxL+ddAIsaS s6CBMEBld1wjlU17GNK4jhwJ7wpKEAqmLTDakr6z76FtgcK2JmQX91GLDcEroLbsWVUX029lmEJ8Q 1Vxh8VHKBSy/tdFlGxG3hBEHVXOx2cCuVbGNqAnDDd1g/zaJYf+T46vEC0eIXtrEUbY3L/exvp6Wf vSrA5w8Ag==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gz367-00060Z-II; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:34:23 +0000 Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 574752393ABA8; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:34:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:34:22 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Lutomirski , Nadav Amit , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Nadav Amit Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/percpu: Differentiate this_cpu_{}() and __this_cpu_{}() Message-ID: <20190227173422.GV32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20190227101252.413192716@infradead.org> <20190227101544.210748832@infradead.org> <20190227164806.GS32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:17:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > It all seems pretty ad-hoc, and we already _know_ that "asm volatile" is bad. Ah, all I wanted was the ONCE thing and my inline asm foo sucks. If +m gets us that, awesome. But the ONCE thing defeats CSE (on purpose!) so for code-gen that likes/wants that we then have to use the __this_cpu crud.