Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:59:17 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Louis Taylor <louis@kragniz.eu>
Cc:     linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, ndesaulniers@google.com,
        jflat@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wusb: use correct format characters
Message-ID: <20190228115917.GA2825@kroah.com>
References: <20190228115256.5446-1-louis@kragniz.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190228115256.5446-1-louis@kragniz.eu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:52:56AM +0000, Louis Taylor wrote:
> When compiling with -Wformat, clang warns:
> 
> ./include/linux/usb/wusb.h:245:5: warning: format specifies type
> 'unsigned short' but the argument has type 'u8' (aka 'unsigned char')
> [-Wformat]
>   ckhdid->data[0],  ckhdid->data[1],
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> ckhdid->data is unconditionally defined as `u8 data[16]`, so this patch
> updates the format characters to the correct one for unsigned char types.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/378
> Signed-off-by: Louis Taylor <louis@kragniz.eu>
> ---
>  include/linux/usb/wusb.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/wusb.h b/include/linux/usb/wusb.h
> index 9e4a3213f2c2..0a3cdf10972d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/usb/wusb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/usb/wusb.h
> @@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ static inline size_t ckhdid_printf(char *pr_ckhdid, size_t size,
>  				   const struct wusb_ckhdid *ckhdid)
>  {
>  	return scnprintf(pr_ckhdid, size,
> -			 "%02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx "
> -			 "%02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx %02hx",
> +			 "%02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu "
> +			 "%02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu %02hhu",

Why did you switch from hex to decimal in the output format?  That feels
very wrong to me.

greg k-h