Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:01:22 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To:     Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
        marc.zyngier@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com,
        shankerd@codeaurora.org, julien.thierry@arm.com,
        mlangsdo@redhat.com, stefan.wahren@i2e.com, Andre.Przywara@arm.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] arm64: add system vulnerability sysfs entries
Message-ID: <20190228120122.GB226495@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
References: <20190227010544.597579-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190227010544.597579-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jeremy,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:05:34PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Jeremy Linton (6):
>   arm64: Provide a command line to disable spectre_v2 mitigation
>   arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for meltdown
>   arm64: Always enable spectrev2 vulnerability detection
>   arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for spectre v2
>   arm64: Always enable ssb vulnerability detection
>   arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for speculative store bypass
> 
> Marc Zyngier (2):
>   arm64: Advertise mitigation of Spectre-v2, or lack thereof
>   arm64: Use firmware to detect CPUs that are not affected by Spectre-v2
> 
> Mian Yousaf Kaukab (2):
>   arm64: add sysfs vulnerability show for spectre v1
>   arm64: enable generic CPU vulnerabilites support

The patches look fine to me (I'm giving them some testing now). However,
It would be nice if we got the acks/reviewed-by tags from the people
that looked at the previous series (Andre, Suzuki, Julien). You haven't
included any tags in this series, I guess there were sufficient changes
not to carry them over.

If I get the acks by tomorrow, I'll queue them for 5.1, otherwise they'd
have to wait for the next merging window.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin