Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:03:03 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI: call add_bus method also for root bus
Message-ID: <20190228130303.GA14225@alpha.franken.de>
References: <20190219155728.19163-1-tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
 <20190219155728.19163-8-tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
 <20190221233708.GC219879@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190221233708.GC219879@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:37:08PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I haven't researched the details of how other platforms do it, but if
> it would be possible for pci-xtalk to do it the same way, that would
> be ideal.

I don't need this patch any longer. So you could just ignore it.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]