Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S132147AbRDCP6m>; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:58:42 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S132167AbRDCP6b>; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:58:31 -0400
Received: from [202.77.223.60] ([202.77.223.60]:58631 "HELO server.achan.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S132147AbRDCP6S>;
	Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:58:18 -0400
Message-ID: <007901c0bc56$bb0bdca0$3700a8c0@pluto>
From: "Andrew Chan" <achan@achan.com>
To: "Ruth Ivimey-Cook" <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bugs@linux-ide.org>
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010403115233.00b97d80@cam-pop.cambridge.arm.com>
Subject: Re: Promise 20267 "working" but no UDMA
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 23:57:05 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Is the issue here about the Promise FastTrack BIOS messing things up? If
> so, why use it, rather than the Promise Ultra100 BIOS, which seems to be
> fine (again, AFAIK).

Ultra100 is okay.

FastTrack is not.

I have no choice since the motherboard has the chip on-board and with
FastTrack BIOS.

I am hoping Andre will come up with something so that I can use this
motherboard.

I don't care much about the Fasttrack RAID part but I do want to utilize its
ATA100 capability.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/